c++.stlsoft - ACE
- Pablo Aguilar (9/9) Feb 24 2005 I started reading C++ Network Programming v1 just a few hours ago. Due t...
- Pablo Aguilar (4/13) Feb 24 2005 BTW I haven't even finished chapter 0, and have already had a good dose ...
- bamb00 (5/21) Feb 25 2005 Id be interested in this too . What does 'reify' mean btw ?
- Pablo Aguilar (4/5) Feb 25 2005 From: http://www.wordreference.com/definition/reify.htm
- Matthew (4/34) Feb 25 2005 Cool. That'll make 3 of us, then. :-)
- Matthew (3/20) Feb 25 2005 He he
- Matthew (21/30) Feb 25 2005 I like ACE, and we found it very useful. It's not what I would term the
- Pablo Aguilar (4/35) Feb 25 2005 Thanks for the info...
I started reading C++ Network Programming v1 just a few hours ago. Due to an unhealthy tendency of mine of always reading 2 things at once I went to see what riverace.com had to offer (it's mentioned a lot in the introduction). There I found references to 3 ACE books, and then a reference to Mattthew's review of C++NPv2 in CUJ. Now, knowing he just got out of an ACE-heavy project, I'm left wondering... how did using it meet the expectations expressed in the review? And what's the reason behind ACEStl? Pablo Aguilar
Feb 24 2005
BTW I haven't even finished chapter 0, and have already had a good dose of the word reify "Pablo Aguilar" <paguilarg hotmail.com> wrote in message news:cvlt56$2crs$1 digitaldaemon.com...I started reading C++ Network Programming v1 just a few hours ago. Due to an unhealthy tendency of mine of always reading 2 things at once I went to see what riverace.com had to offer (it's mentioned a lot in the introduction). There I found references to 3 ACE books, and then a reference to Mattthew's review of C++NPv2 in CUJ. Now, knowing he just got out of an ACE-heavy project, I'm left wondering... how did using it meet the expectations expressed in the review? And what's the reason behind ACEStl? Pablo Aguilar
Feb 24 2005
Id be interested in this too . What does 'reify' mean btw ? C "Pablo Aguilar" <paguilarg hotmail.com> wrote in message news:cvlt7d$2csn$1 digitaldaemon.com...BTW I haven't even finished chapter 0, and have already had a good dose of the word reify "Pablo Aguilar" <paguilarg hotmail.com> wrote in message news:cvlt56$2crs$1 digitaldaemon.com...toI started reading C++ Network Programming v1 just a few hours ago. Due to an unhealthy tendency of mine of always reading 2 things at once I wentsee what riverace.com had to offer (it's mentioned a lot in the introduction). There I found references to 3 ACE books, and then a reference to Mattthew's review of C++NPv2 in CUJ. Now, knowing he just got out of an ACE-heavy project, I'm left wondering... how did using it meet the expectations expressed in the review? And what's the reason behind ACEStl? Pablo Aguilar
Feb 25 2005
"Pablo Aguilar" <paguilarg hotmail.com>
From: http://www.wordreference.com/definition/reify.htm
" consider an abstract concept to be real "
"bamb00" <no email.com> wrote in message
news:cvo29u$1gsc$1 digitaldaemon.com...
Id be interested in this too . What does 'reify' mean btw ?
Feb 25 2005
"bamb00" <no email.com> wrote in message news:cvo29u$1gsc$1 digitaldaemon.com...Id be interested in this too .Cool. That'll make 3 of us, then. :-)What does 'reify' mean btw ?It means "to make real"C "Pablo Aguilar" <paguilarg hotmail.com> wrote in message news:cvlt7d$2csn$1 digitaldaemon.com...BTW I haven't even finished chapter 0, and have already had a good dose of the word reify "Pablo Aguilar" <paguilarg hotmail.com> wrote in message news:cvlt56$2crs$1 digitaldaemon.com...toI started reading C++ Network Programming v1 just a few hours ago. Due to an unhealthy tendency of mine of always reading 2 things at once I wentsee what riverace.com had to offer (it's mentioned a lot in the introduction). There I found references to 3 ACE books, and then a reference to Mattthew's review of C++NPv2 in CUJ. Now, knowing he just got out of an ACE-heavy project, I'm left wondering... how did using it meet the expectations expressed in the review? And what's the reason behind ACEStl? Pablo Aguilar
Feb 25 2005
He he "Pablo Aguilar" <paguilarg hotmail.com> wrote in message news:cvlt7d$2csn$1 digitaldaemon.com...BTW I haven't even finished chapter 0, and have already had a good dose of the word reify "Pablo Aguilar" <paguilarg hotmail.com> wrote in message news:cvlt56$2crs$1 digitaldaemon.com...I started reading C++ Network Programming v1 just a few hours ago. Due to an unhealthy tendency of mine of always reading 2 things at once I went to see what riverace.com had to offer (it's mentioned a lot in the introduction). There I found references to 3 ACE books, and then a reference to Mattthew's review of C++NPv2 in CUJ. Now, knowing he just got out of an ACE-heavy project, I'm left wondering... how did using it meet the expectations expressed in the review? And what's the reason behind ACEStl? Pablo Aguilar
Feb 25 2005
"Pablo Aguilar" <paguilarg hotmail.com> wrote in message news:cvlt56$2crs$1 digitaldaemon.com...I started reading C++ Network Programming v1 just a few hours ago. Due to an unhealthy tendency of mine of always reading 2 things at once I went to see what riverace.com had to offer (it's mentioned a lot in the introduction). There I found references to 3 ACE books, and then a reference to Mattthew's review of C++NPv2 in CUJ. Now, knowing he just got out of an ACE-heavy project, I'm left wondering... how did using it meet the expectations expressed in the review?I like ACE, and we found it very useful. It's not what I would term the best C++ I've ever seen, by any means, but as a library it's top notch. I'm hoping to give feedback to the ACE team as soon as I have some free time. There were several confusing/misleading things in the 3 books, but once we'd got past them, we came up with a really powerful architecture, which has so far proven exceptionally reliable.And what's the reason behind ACEStl?Because there were lots of things that I needed that're not present in ACE, and which are now present in ACESTL, including: - Custom event handling - now provided in acestl::custom_event_handler - linear byte-wise enumeration of the contents of a message queue - now provided in acestl::message_queue_sequence and quite a few utility functions, for ACE_Message_Block, sockets, time strings, string access, etc. Since I'm only now hours away from STLSoft 1.8.3b1, you'll be able to have an (as yet undocumented) play with them very soon. :-) Cheers Matthew
Feb 25 2005
Thanks for the info... Good luck with 1.8.3! "Matthew" <admin stlsoft.dot.dot.dot.dot.org> wrote in message news:cvo4la$1j9k$1 digitaldaemon.com..."Pablo Aguilar" <paguilarg hotmail.com> wrote in message news:cvlt56$2crs$1 digitaldaemon.com...I started reading C++ Network Programming v1 just a few hours ago. Due to an unhealthy tendency of mine of always reading 2 things at once I went to see what riverace.com had to offer (it's mentioned a lot in the introduction). There I found references to 3 ACE books, and then a reference to Mattthew's review of C++NPv2 in CUJ. Now, knowing he just got out of an ACE-heavy project, I'm left wondering... how did using it meet the expectations expressed in the review?I like ACE, and we found it very useful. It's not what I would term the best C++ I've ever seen, by any means, but as a library it's top notch. I'm hoping to give feedback to the ACE team as soon as I have some free time. There were several confusing/misleading things in the 3 books, but once we'd got past them, we came up with a really powerful architecture, which has so far proven exceptionally reliable.And what's the reason behind ACEStl?Because there were lots of things that I needed that're not present in ACE, and which are now present in ACESTL, including: - Custom event handling - now provided in acestl::custom_event_handler - linear byte-wise enumeration of the contents of a message queue - now provided in acestl::message_queue_sequence and quite a few utility functions, for ACE_Message_Block, sockets, time strings, string access, etc. Since I'm only now hours away from STLSoft 1.8.3b1, you'll be able to have an (as yet undocumented) play with them very soon. :-) Cheers Matthew
Feb 25 2005