• cal (15/15) Jun 11 2012 Does a switch statement acting on a template parameter act just
• Dmitry Olshansky (4/17) Jun 12 2012 It doesn't. It's easy to check anyway.
• cal (4/5) Jun 12 2012 Not for me :) I just saw that it worked, and wondered if it
• bearophile (5/8) Jun 12 2012 See:

"cal" <callumenator gmail.com> writes:

Does a switch statement acting on a template parameter act just 
like a chain of  static if-else's? That is, does it just generate 
the code for the matching case?

enum E { A, B, C }

class Blah(E param) {
   void foo() {
     switch(param) {
       case(E.A) : blah;
       case(E.B) : ....
       default:
     }
   }
}

Thanks,
cal

Dmitry Olshansky <dmitry.olsh gmail.com> writes:

On 12.06.2012 10:13, cal wrote:
 Does a switch statement acting on a template parameter act just like a
 chain of static if-else's? That is, does it just generate the code for
 the matching case?

 enum E { A, B, C }

 class Blah(E param) {
 void foo() {
 switch(param) {
 case(E.A) : blah;
 case(E.B) : ....
 default:
 }
 }
 }

It doesn't. It's easy to check anyway.

-- 
Dmitry Olshansky

"cal" <callumenator gmail.com> writes:

On Tuesday, 12 June 2012 at 08:35:44 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
 It doesn't. It's easy to check anyway.

Not for me :) I just saw that it worked, and wondered if it 
worked statically.
Thanks!

"bearophile" <bearophileHUGS lycos.com> writes:

cal:

 Does a switch statement acting on a template parameter act just 
 like a chain of  static if-else's? That is, does it just 
 generate the code for the matching case?

See:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6921

Bye,
bearophile