digitalmars.D - getting started in D
- Erik Lechak (10/10) May 11 2008 Hello All,
- =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Anders_F_Bj=F6rklund?= (10/34) May 11 2008 If you are using the D1 language, then you need to instead look at:
- Derek Parnell (8/9) May 11 2008 I developed Bud on a DMD/Windows box and I rely on the kindeness of
- Don (4/11) May 13 2008 Are you planning on another release? IIRC, it's been two years since the...
Hello All, I hope this is correct forum to ask these questions. I just started looking at D. I was excited to go about writing my first application but ran into a few problems. I decided to use gdc ( maybe this was the first problem? ). Is gdc behind the times with respect to the dmd compiler? I noticed that the standard library (phobos) was missing several functions that are documented here: http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/phobos/phobos.html "std.string.startsWith" and "std.process.shell" are two that I recall being missing. I used a standard debian gdc install. I have the directory /usr/include/d/4.1 and a link /usr/include/d/4.1.3 that links back to 4.1. All the files appear to be there but they are missing functionality. Am I using the wrong libraries? Is there a better or more up to date Phobos library? Happily I got a program to compile and run ... wooohooo ... So I tried to get fancy and write my own module. It took me a while, but I finally figured out I needed a build tool to do an "automated" build (like javac does). So I tried to compile "build" / "bud" version 3.04. It failed to compile. So I spent some time fixing "bud" and got it to compile. Now it runs fine. Since "bud" didn't want to compile out of the box, I have to assume that it is not the approved method of compiling D code. So what is the recommended way to compile D code? Is anyone interested in my modified version of "bud" that compiles under gdc? Does "bud" compile with dmd without problems? Thanks, Erik Lechak
May 11 2008
Erik Lechak wrote:I decided to use gdc ( maybe this was the first problem? ). Is gdc behind the times with respect to the dmd compiler? I noticed that the standard library (phobos) was missing several functions that are documented here: http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/phobos/phobos.html "std.string.startsWith" and "std.process.shell" are two that I recall being missing.If you are using the D1 language, then you need to instead look at: http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/phobos/phobos.htmlI used a standard debian gdc install. I have the directory /usr/include/d/4.1 and a link /usr/include/d/4.1.3 that links back to 4.1. All the files appear to be there but they are missing functionality. Am I using the wrong libraries? Is there a better or more up to date Phobos library?The debian package uses version 1 of the D language, probably since version 2 is still in an alpha stage and changing rapidly... You might also want to take a peek at the Tango library instead ? http://dsource.org/projects/tango/ (it replaces the Phobos library)Happily I got a program to compile and run ... wooohooo ... So I tried to get fancy and write my own module. It took me a while, but I finally figured out I needed a build tool to do an "automated" build (like javac does). So I tried to compile "build" / "bud" version 3.04. It failed to compile. So I spent some time fixing "bud" and got it to compile. Now it runs fine. Since "bud" didn't want to compile out of the box, I have to assume that it is not the approved method of compiling D code. So what is the recommended way to compile D code? Is anyone interested in my modified version of "bud" that compiles under gdc? Does "bud" compile with dmd without problems?The "bud" tool is mostly for DMD, the "rebuild" tool from DSSS works better with GDC. Both uses version(build) and accomplish same thing. --anders
May 11 2008
On Sun, 11 May 2008 03:35:07 -0400, Erik Lechak wrote:Since "bud" didn't want to compile out of the box ...I developed Bud on a DMD/Windows box and I rely on the kindeness of strangers to tell me about GDC and/or linux problems with it. However, I am improving its compatiblity with Linux ... gdc I'm not so sure about. -- Derek Parnell Melbourne, Australia skype: derek.j.parnell
May 11 2008
Derek Parnell wrote:On Sun, 11 May 2008 03:35:07 -0400, Erik Lechak wrote:Are you planning on another release? IIRC, it's been two years since the last one. Not that I have any complaints about it.Since "bud" didn't want to compile out of the box ...I developed Bud on a DMD/Windows box and I rely on the kindeness of strangers to tell me about GDC and/or linux problems with it. However, I am improving its compatiblity with Linux ... gdc I'm not so sure about.
May 13 2008