• Frank Benoit (6/6) Jun 24 2008 Hi
• Bill Baxter (5/13) Jun 24 2008 Indeed. Both the initial load before the prompt is active and the
• Jascha Wetzel (8/16) Jun 29 2008 yes, there should be several opportunities to optimize it.

Frank Benoit <keinfarbton googlemail.com> writes:

Hi

When i load a jface application, that can take a while. About 10-30 sec.
I wonder if that can be optimized?
If not allready done, perhaps disabling the GC for the duration of this 
loading?

Frank

Bill Baxter <dnewsgroup billbaxter.com> writes:

Frank Benoit wrote:
 Hi
 
 When i load a jface application, that can take a while. About 10-30 sec.
 I wonder if that can be optimized?
 If not allready done, perhaps disabling the GC for the duration of this 
 loading?
 
 Frank

Indeed.  Both the initial load before the prompt is active and the 
subsequent startup time after typing 'r' (processing DLLs) are both a 
little long.

--bb

Jascha Wetzel <firstname mainia.de> writes:

Frank Benoit wrote:
 Hi
 
 When i load a jface application, that can take a while. About 10-30 sec.
 I wonder if that can be optimized?
 If not allready done, perhaps disabling the GC for the duration of this 
 loading?
 
 Frank

yes, there should be several opportunities to optimize it.
ddbg builds an AVL tree for the code-address to source-file/line 
mapping, s.t. stepping through the code is faster. i guess there's a lot 
of unnecessary heap action while building the tree.
i've setup a ticket here:
https://trac.mainia.de/ddbg/ticket/7

please drop me an e-mail if you'd like an account for the ticket system.