• Jakob Ovrum (16/16) Mar 14 2016 Hello,
• =?UTF-8?B?Tm9yZGzDtnc=?= (3/6) Mar 14 2016 Looks great, apart from the red-flags on the bottom-right of the
• Jakob Ovrum (3/9) Mar 14 2016 Thanks. Those are actually Gravatar images blocked by the Request
• Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d-announce (14/18) Mar 14 2016 Is this intended as a Stylist style option for the site?
• jmh530 (2/4) Mar 14 2016 I disagree.
• Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d-announce (14/19) Mar 14 2016 Your choice, which is why the site should have both, so as not to piss
• jmh530 (2/4) Mar 14 2016 Fair enough.
• Jakob Ovrum (13/16) Mar 14 2016 Yeah, I just don't want to bother with authenticating on their

Jakob Ovrum <jakobovrum gmail.com> writes:

Hello,

Here's a light-on-dark theme userstyle for the recent dlang.org 
re-design:

https://gist.github.com/JakobOvrum/e00f97f30bba4b24b6bc

The front page looks like this:

https://i.imgur.com/zuwVu7r.png

The theme supports the front page, articles, language 
specification, Phobos documentation and the forums. Other 
subdomains, like code.dlang.org, issues.dlang.org and 
wiki.dlang.org are unaffected.

The userstyle document is compatible with Stylish/Firefox. I 
might put it on the Stylish repository in the future for easier 
install.

Suggestions, forks, uploads to Stylish and so forth are all 
welcome. The important part is that we have an alternative that 
is nice on the eyes for us who use dark-coloured UIs.

=?UTF-8?B?Tm9yZGzDtnc=?= <per.nordlow gmail.com> writes:

On Monday, 14 March 2016 at 12:00:24 UTC, Jakob Ovrum wrote:
 Suggestions, forks, uploads to Stylish and so forth are all 
 welcome. The important part is that we have an alternative that 
 is nice on the eyes for us who use dark-coloured UIs.

Looks great, apart from the red-flags on the bottom-right of the 
screen being a bit too dark.

Jakob Ovrum <jakobovrum gmail.com> writes:

On Monday, 14 March 2016 at 13:25:02 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
 On Monday, 14 March 2016 at 12:00:24 UTC, Jakob Ovrum wrote:
 Suggestions, forks, uploads to Stylish and so forth are all 
 welcome. The important part is that we have an alternative 
 that is nice on the eyes for us who use dark-coloured UIs.

 Looks great, apart from the red-flags on the bottom-right of 
 the screen being a bit too dark.

Thanks. Those are actually Gravatar images blocked by the Request 
Policy extension.

Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d-announce writes:

On Mon, 2016-03-14 at 12:00 +0000, Jakob Ovrum via Digitalmars-d-
announce wrote:
 Hello,
=20
 Here's a light-on-dark theme userstyle for the recent dlang.org=C2=A0
 re-design:

Is this intended as a Stylist style option for the site?

Light writing on dark background is so much nicer that the reverse.

--=20
Russel.
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D
Dr Russel Winder      t: +44 20 7585 2200   voip: sip:russel.winder ekiga.n=
et
41 Buckmaster Road    m: +44 7770 465 077   xmpp: russel winder.org.uk
London SW11 1EN, UK   w: www.russel.org.uk  skype: russel_winder

jmh530 <john.michael.hall gmail.com> writes:

On Monday, 14 March 2016 at 16:42:27 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
 Light writing on dark background is so much nicer that the 
 reverse.

I disagree.

Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d-announce writes:

On Mon, 2016-03-14 at 17:14 +0000, jmh530 via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
 On Monday, 14 March 2016 at 16:42:27 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
=20
 Light writing on dark background is so much nicer that the=C2=A0
 reverse.

 I disagree.

Your choice, which is why the site should have both, so as not to piss
off the people who disagree.

--=20
Russel.
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D
Dr Russel Winder      t: +44 20 7585 2200   voip: sip:russel.winder ekiga.n=
et
41 Buckmaster Road    m: +44 7770 465 077   xmpp: russel winder.org.uk
London SW11 1EN, UK   w: www.russel.org.uk  skype: russel_winder

jmh530 <john.michael.hall gmail.com> writes:

On Monday, 14 March 2016 at 17:39:43 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
 Your choice, which is why the site should have both, so as not 
 to piss off the people who disagree.

Fair enough.

Jakob Ovrum <jakobovrum gmail.com> writes:

On Monday, 14 March 2016 at 16:42:27 UTC, Russel Winder wrote:
 Is this intended as a Stylist style option for the site?

Yeah, I just don't want to bother with authenticating on their 
site right now. Feel free to submit it if you'd like to see it 
there. I don't know how maintenance/updating of userstyles on the 
Stylish repository works but how bad could it be? :)

 Light writing on dark background is so much nicer that the 
 reverse.

I personally agree, but I don't really care which is the default 
as long as both are available.

The issue with light-on-dark is that if it's not applied 
consistently then the occasional "flashes of light" will be 
really disruptive, bordering on painful, and apparently for some 
people it's even a medical issue. I really like how Stylish 
handles this conveniently in a non-intrusive manner. People who 
don't care don't even have to know about it.