• Basile Burg (12/12) Jun 09 2015 Coedit, the small IDE for the D DMD compiler goes gold
• Dennis Ritchie (2/3) Jun 09 2015 Thanks!
• Sean Campbell (5/17) Jun 09 2015 I've been wanting to switch a D based editor for a while but at
• Basile Burg (7/13) Jun 10 2015 You cant. But as the Windows are docked, is it really a problem ?
• Sean Campbell (6/21) Jun 11 2015 No it didn't, the source editor, the symbol list, project
• Andrei Alexandrescu (2/3) Jun 09 2015 I can haz OSX pliz pliz ok thx bye -- Andrei
• Basile Burg (6/9) Jun 10 2015 No, because i don't have the hardware necessary to release the
• Andre Kostur (4/12) Jun 10 2015 Did that someone submit the source code, project files, etc. necessary
• Basile Burg (6/23) Jun 10 2015 Yes, everything is in the sources. Actually there's really not
• Andrei Alexandrescu (3/24) Jun 10 2015 Well does anyone want to take up on this? Would be great to support all
• Andre Kostur (4/7) Jun 10 2015 Let's see how far I can get. I've got the toolchain installed and tried...
• Basile Burg (8/17) Jun 11 2015 a summary of what's to be done:
• Jacob Carlborg (6/9) Jun 11 2015 May I ask why? Carbon is obsolete, for Cocoa there's this [1] [2].
• Basile Burg (6/15) Jun 11 2015 Because of the "Big Mouth Syndrome". Actually i don't know which
• Jacob Carlborg (4/9) Jun 10 2015 Anything that's not Cocoa is not acceptable on OS X.
• Jacob Carlborg (5/6) Jun 10 2015 Having D/Objective-C merged [1] would make it a lot easier.
• =?UTF-8?B?U8O2bmtlIEx1ZHdpZw==?= (2/6) Jun 11 2015 +1
• Paolo Invernizzi (2/6) Jun 11 2015 +1000
• Brian Schott (2/6) Jun 11 2015 Would it? Coedit is written in Pascal.
• Jacob Carlborg (7/8) Jun 11 2015 Really? I had no idea. I just assumed it was written in D. If it's
• =?UTF-8?B?IkrDvHJnZW4=?= Reichmann" (6/6) Jun 21 2015 Thanks, trying it right now.
• Basile Burg (3/9) Jun 21 2015 No, at least not in version 1. Even if CE is based on the same

"Basile Burg" <basile.burg gmx.com> writes:

Coedit, the small IDE for the D DMD compiler goes gold

- Information

https://github.com/BBasile/Coedit

https://github.com/BBasile/Coedit/releases/tag/1_gold

https://github.com/BBasile/Coedit/wiki


- Downloads:


https://github.com/BBasile/Coedit/releases/download/1_gold/coedit.1gold.linux32.setup.zip

https://github.com/BBasile/Coedit/releases/download/1_gold/coedit.1gold.linux32.zip

https://github.com/BBasile/Coedit/releases/download/1_gold/coedit.1gold.linux64.setup.zip

https://github.com/BBasile/Coedit/releases/download/1_gold/coedit.1gold.linux64.zip

https://github.com/BBasile/Coedit/releases/download/1_gold/coedit.1gold.win32.setup.zip

https://github.com/BBasile/Coedit/releases/download/1_gold/coedit.1gold.win32.zip

"Dennis Ritchie" <dennis.ritchie mail.ru> writes:

On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 01:23:00 UTC, Basile Burg wrote:
 Coedit, the small IDE for the D DMD compiler goes gold

Thanks!

"Sean Campbell" <sycam.inc gmail.com> writes:

On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 01:23:00 UTC, Basile Burg wrote:
 Coedit, the small IDE for the D DMD compiler goes gold

 - Information

 https://github.com/BBasile/Coedit

 https://github.com/BBasile/Coedit/releases/tag/1_gold

 https://github.com/BBasile/Coedit/wiki


 - Downloads:


 https://github.com/BBasile/Coedit/releases/download/1_gold/coedit.1gold.linux32.setup.zip

 https://github.com/BBasile/Coedit/releases/download/1_gold/coedit.1gold.linux32.zip

 https://github.com/BBasile/Coedit/releases/download/1_gold/coedit.1gold.linux64.setup.zip

 https://github.com/BBasile/Coedit/releases/download/1_gold/coedit.1gold.linux64.zip

 https://github.com/BBasile/Coedit/releases/download/1_gold/coedit.1gold.win32.setup.zip

 https://github.com/BBasile/Coedit/releases/download/1_gold/coedit.1gold.win32.zip

I've been wanting to switch a D based editor for a while but at 
least on windows, everything is on a different window and I cant 
figure out how to
change this.

"Basile Burg" <basile.burg gmx.com> writes:

On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 03:49:04 UTC, Sean Campbell wrote:
 On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 01:23:00 UTC, Basile Burg wrote:
 Coedit, the small IDE for the D DMD compiler goes gold

 I've been wanting to switch a D based editor for a while but at 
 least on windows, everything is on a different window and I 
 cant figure out how to
 change this.

You cant. But as the Windows are docked, is it really a problem ?
If some of the widgets look superfluous to you then you can close 
them and just use the Window menu when you need them.

I'm afraid that there might be an misunderstanding, when you 
started the software for the first time, it looked a bit like 
that: http://imgur.com/CecC9Cm , right ?

"Sean Campbell" <sycam.inc gmail.com> writes:

On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 16:07:27 UTC, Basile Burg wrote:
 On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 03:49:04 UTC, Sean Campbell wrote:
 On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 01:23:00 UTC, Basile Burg wrote:
 Coedit, the small IDE for the D DMD compiler goes gold

 I've been wanting to switch a D based editor for a while but 
 at least on windows, everything is on a different window and I 
 cant figure out how to
 change this.

 You cant. But as the Windows are docked, is it really a problem 
 ?
 If some of the widgets look superfluous to you then you can 
 close them and just use the Window menu when you need them.

 I'm afraid that there might be an misunderstanding, when you 
 started the software for the first time, it looked a bit like 
 that: http://imgur.com/CecC9Cm , right ?

No it didn't, the source editor, the symbol list, project 
inspector, etc.
were all on different windows, but I deleted the Coedit folder in 
appdata
and it fixed itself.

Andrei Alexandrescu <SeeWebsiteForEmail erdani.org> writes:

On 6/9/15 6:22 PM, Basile Burg wrote:
 Coedit, the small IDE for the D DMD compiler goes gold

I can haz OSX pliz pliz ok thx bye -- Andrei

"Basile Burg" <basile.burg gmx.com> writes:

On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 06:57:09 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu 
wrote:
 On 6/9/15 6:22 PM, Basile Burg wrote:
 Coedit, the small IDE for the D DMD compiler goes gold

 I can haz OSX pliz pliz ok thx bye -- Andrei

No, because i don't have the hardware necessary to release the 
mac OSX version. There's someone who succeeded to build it but it 
doesn't look like he wanted to be more involved than that in the 
project.

Andre Kostur <andre kostur.net> writes:

On 2015-06-10 7:22 AM, Basile Burg wrote:
 On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 06:57:09 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
 On 6/9/15 6:22 PM, Basile Burg wrote:
 Coedit, the small IDE for the D DMD compiler goes gold

 I can haz OSX pliz pliz ok thx bye -- Andrei

 No, because i don't have the hardware necessary to release the mac OSX
 version. There's someone who succeeded to build it but it doesn't look
 like he wanted to be more involved than that in the project.

Did that someone submit the source code, project files, etc. necessary 
to build on OSX so that someone else might be able to follow in his 
footsteps?

"Basile Burg" <basile.burg gmx.com> writes:

On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 16:32:19 UTC, Andre Kostur wrote:
 On 2015-06-10 7:22 AM, Basile Burg wrote:
 On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 06:57:09 UTC, Andrei 
 Alexandrescu wrote:
 On 6/9/15 6:22 PM, Basile Burg wrote:
 Coedit, the small IDE for the D DMD compiler goes gold

 I can haz OSX pliz pliz ok thx bye -- Andrei

 No, because i don't have the hardware necessary to release the 
 mac OSX
 version. There's someone who succeeded to build it but it 
 doesn't look
 like he wanted to be more involved than that in the project.

 Did that someone submit the source code, project files, etc. 
 necessary to build on OSX so that someone else might be able to 
 follow in his footsteps?

Yes, everything is in the sources. Actually there's really not 
much to do (i estimate this to 50 SLOC spreaded in 3 or 4 
portions of code with {$IFDEF DARWIN}...{$ENDIF}). The problem is 
just that i don't know if it's usable.
Also the guy compiled with the Qt interface instead of Cocoa.

Andrei Alexandrescu <SeeWebsiteForEmail erdani.org> writes:

On 6/10/15 10:04 AM, Basile Burg wrote:
 On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 16:32:19 UTC, Andre Kostur wrote:
 On 2015-06-10 7:22 AM, Basile Burg wrote:
 On Wednesday, 10 June 2015 at 06:57:09 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
 On 6/9/15 6:22 PM, Basile Burg wrote:
 Coedit, the small IDE for the D DMD compiler goes gold

 I can haz OSX pliz pliz ok thx bye -- Andrei

 No, because i don't have the hardware necessary to release the mac OSX
 version. There's someone who succeeded to build it but it doesn't look
 like he wanted to be more involved than that in the project.

 Did that someone submit the source code, project files, etc. necessary
 to build on OSX so that someone else might be able to follow in his
 footsteps?

 Yes, everything is in the sources. Actually there's really not much to
 do (i estimate this to 50 SLOC spreaded in 3 or 4 portions of code with
 {$IFDEF DARWIN}...{$ENDIF}). The problem is just that i don't know if
 it's usable.
 Also the guy compiled with the Qt interface instead of Cocoa.

Well does anyone want to take up on this? Would be great to support all 
major desktoprs. Andre? -- Andrei

Andre Kostur <andre kostur.net> writes:

On 2015-06-10 11:10 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
 On 6/10/15 10:04 AM, Basile Burg wrote:

 Well does anyone want to take up on this? Would be great to support all
 major desktoprs. Andre? -- Andrei

Let's see how far I can get.  I've got the toolchain installed and tried 
a first build that didn't quite make it.  I'll work on it for a bit to 
see if I can get a viable executable.

"Basile Burg" <basile.burg gmx.com> writes:

On Thursday, 11 June 2015 at 05:19:54 UTC, Andre Kostur wrote:
 On 2015-06-10 11:10 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
 On 6/10/15 10:04 AM, Basile Burg wrote:

 Well does anyone want to take up on this? Would be great to 
 support all
 major desktoprs. Andre? -- Andrei

 Let's see how far I can get.  I've got the toolchain installed 
 and tried a first build that didn't quite make it.  I'll work 
 on it for a bit to see if I can get a viable executable.

a summary of what's to be done:

https://gist.github.com/BBasile/bae24a536f2b390e5beb

never mind if you don't succeed. By the way i think that it'll 
only work with
the Carbon interface, so only a 32 bit application:

http://wiki.freepascal.org/Carbon_Interface#Application_Bundle

But i'm not sure. Last time i've used a mac was in 1995.

Jacob Carlborg <doob me.com> writes:

On 2015-06-11 17:22, Basile Burg wrote:

 never mind if you don't succeed. By the way i think that it'll only work
 with
 the Carbon interface, so only a 32 bit application:

May I ask why? Carbon is obsolete, for Cocoa there's this [1] [2].

[1] http://wiki.freepascal.org/Cocoa_Interface
[2] http://wiki.freepascal.org/FPC_PasCocoa

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg

"Basile Burg" <basile.burg gmx.com> writes:

On Friday, 12 June 2015 at 06:25:04 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
 On 2015-06-11 17:22, Basile Burg wrote:

 never mind if you don't succeed. By the way i think that it'll 
 only work
 with
 the Carbon interface, so only a 32 bit application:

 May I ask why? Carbon is obsolete, for Cocoa there's this [1] 
 [2].

 [1] http://wiki.freepascal.org/Cocoa_Interface
 [2] http://wiki.freepascal.org/FPC_PasCocoa

Because of the "Big Mouth Syndrome". Actually i don't know which 
is the best choice for the interface. If someone manages to build 
it that's a good thing. Whatever is the interface. By the way, 
this person can use the GH bug tracker if there's something not 
clear.

Jacob Carlborg <doob me.com> writes:

On 2015-06-10 19:04, Basile Burg wrote:

 Yes, everything is in the sources. Actually there's really not much to
 do (i estimate this to 50 SLOC spreaded in 3 or 4 portions of code with
 {$IFDEF DARWIN}...{$ENDIF}). The problem is just that i don't know if
 it's usable.
 Also the guy compiled with the Qt interface instead of Cocoa.

Anything that's not Cocoa is not acceptable on OS X.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg

Jacob Carlborg <doob me.com> writes:

On 2015-06-10 08:57, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:

 I can haz OSX pliz pliz ok thx bye -- Andrei

Having D/Objective-C merged [1] would make it a lot easier.

[1] https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/4321

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg

=?UTF-8?B?U8O2bmtlIEx1ZHdpZw==?= <sludwig rejectedsoftware.com> writes:

Am 11.06.2015 um 08:28 schrieb Jacob Carlborg:
 On 2015-06-10 08:57, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:

 I can haz OSX pliz pliz ok thx bye -- Andrei

 Having D/Objective-C merged [1] would make it a lot easier.

 [1] https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/4321

+1

"Paolo Invernizzi" <paolo.invernizzi no.address> writes:

On Thursday, 11 June 2015 at 06:28:08 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
 On 2015-06-10 08:57, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:

 I can haz OSX pliz pliz ok thx bye -- Andrei

 Having D/Objective-C merged [1] would make it a lot easier.

 [1] https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/4321

+1000

"Brian Schott" <briancschott gmail.com> writes:

On Thursday, 11 June 2015 at 06:28:08 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
 On 2015-06-10 08:57, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:

 I can haz OSX pliz pliz ok thx bye -- Andrei

 Having D/Objective-C merged [1] would make it a lot easier.

 [1] https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/4321

Would it? Coedit is written in Pascal.

Jacob Carlborg <doob me.com> writes:

On 2015-06-11 11:51, Brian Schott wrote:

 Would it? Coedit is written in Pascal.

Really? I had no idea. I just assumed it was written in D. If it's 
written in Pascal then there's no excuses [1] :)

Anyway, it wouldn't hurt :)

[1] http://wiki.freepascal.org/FPC_PasCocoa

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg

=?UTF-8?B?IkrDvHJnZW4=?= Reichmann" <jr rdvsb.de> writes:

Thanks, trying it right now.

Any plans to support multiple window editing as it's possible in 
Lazarus IDE ?
http://lazarus-dev.blogspot.fr/2010/04/using-multiply-editor-windows.html

I can't live without it when editing source files

Jürgen

"Basile Burg" <basile.burg gmx.com> writes:

On Sunday, 21 June 2015 at 20:24:53 UTC, Jürgen Reichmann wrote:
 Thanks, trying it right now.

 Any plans to support multiple window editing as it's possible 
 in Lazarus IDE ?
 http://lazarus-dev.blogspot.fr/2010/04/using-multiply-editor-windows.html

 I can't live without it when editing source files

 Jürgen

No, at least not in version 1. Even if CE is based on the same 
components it has a totally different architecture than Lazarus.