digitalmars.D.announce - announcements
- bobef (3/3) Aug 12 2005 Just thought... should we anounce (should I say flood) every 0.000000001...
- Derek Parnell (13/16) Aug 12 2005 My previous announcements were in March, April, and May. I thought I'd
- Derek Parnell (6/6) Aug 12 2005 For those with a RSS reader, I'll keep you informed by updating ...
- bobef (3/11) Aug 12 2005 You got point.
- Ben Hinkle (8/13) Aug 12 2005 My own .02 is that bugfixes shouldn't be announced but it's fine to anno...
- bobef (2/8) Aug 12 2005 Support.
- Dejan Lekic (8/8) Aug 12 2005 Bob, simply skip those announcement threads that You find not interestin...
- Jarrett Billingsley (8/12) Aug 12 2005 Well, that's rather close-minded. If someone made a program in D and wa...
- Dejan Lekic (25/25) Aug 12 2005 Mr. Billingsley, maybe I am close-minded, but if someone uses this newsg...
- J Thomas (2/26) Aug 12 2005
- Jarrett Billingsley (10/37) Aug 13 2005 Fair enough. I'm used to the typical Linuxheads with huge egoes who won...
- Walter (3/3) Aug 13 2005 The licenses for DMD were set up so that both open and closed source
- Dejan Lekic (9/9) Aug 13 2005 Walter, I just wanted to note that I never said closed-source project
- Walter (3/6) Aug 13 2005 Hey, no problem. It was a global comment I made, not directed at anyone.
- Daniel Kos (6/8) Aug 12 2005 Yes, why not? I don't have to visit every site of the project to see the...
- J Thomas (2/7) Aug 12 2005
Just thought... should we anounce (should I say flood) every 0.000000001 version change in our things here? Or once we announce something everyone interested can check our site (if there is such) for updates?
Aug 12 2005
On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 09:23:26 +0000 (UTC), bobef wrote:Just thought... should we anounce (should I say flood) every 0.000000001 version change in our things here? Or once we announce something everyone interested can check our site (if there is such) for updates?My previous announcements were in March, April, and May. I thought I'd place a notice here this time simply because it has been a few months since there had been any change. All my normal announcements are placed in the DSource site. So I've placed a total of 4 here over six months - is that flooding? Who has been flooding the group with announcements? And if we only ever make one announcement here, how would people, who are new to the group, get to hear about new releases if they never saw the first notice? -- Derek Parnell Melbourne, Australia 12/08/2005 8:14:00 PM
Aug 12 2005
For those with a RSS reader, I'll keep you informed by updating ... http://www.users.bigpond.com/ddparnell/build.rss -- Derek Parnell Melbourne, Australia 12/08/2005 8:52:40 PM
Aug 12 2005
My previous announcements were in March, April, and May. I thought I'd place a notice here this time simply because it has been a few months since there had been any change. All my normal announcements are placed in the DSource site. So I've placed a total of 4 here over six months - is that flooding?I don't think so :)Who has been flooding the group with announcements?I don't accuse anyone. Just share my thoughts...And if we only ever make one announcement here, how would people, who are new to the group, get to hear about new releases if they never saw the first notice?You got point.
Aug 12 2005
"bobef" <bobef_member pathlink.com> wrote in message news:ddhpqd$2tq6$1 digitaldaemon.com...Just thought... should we anounce (should I say flood) every 0.000000001 version change in our things here? Or once we announce something everyone interested can check our site (if there is such) for updates?My own .02 is that bugfixes shouldn't be announced but it's fine to announce an update that contains new features or big changes. I don't think this newsgroup gets too much traffic. Design discussions for particular projects should probably move to dsource or some other forum if they get long. If an announcement spawns a rather long thread that I'm not interested in I skip it.
Aug 12 2005
In article <ddi3dp$7hv$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Ben Hinkle says...My own .02 is that bugfixes shouldn't be announced but it's fine to announce an update that contains new features or big changes. I don't think this newsgroup gets too much traffic. Design discussions for particular projects should probably move to dsource or some other forum if they get long. If an announcement spawns a rather long thread that I'm not interested in I skip it.Support.
Aug 12 2005
Bob, simply skip those announcement threads that You find not interesting - that is what I do, especially those which are non-free and/or closed-source... -- ........... Dejan Lekic http://dejan.lekic.org
Aug 12 2005
"Dejan Lekic" <leka entropy.tmok.com> wrote in message news:ddil7c$s1t$1 digitaldaemon.com...Bob, simply skip those announcement threads that You find not interesting - that is what I do, especially those which are non-free and/or closed-source...Well, that's rather close-minded. If someone made a program in D and was actually making money off it, I would be pretty excited for them, as a commercial product made in D could only mean better exposure for D. And as I'm making a (currently) closed-source project, I take this comment somewhat personally. Then again, with your attitude towards closed-source software, you're probably using Linux and wouldn't be able to use my project anyway.
Aug 12 2005
Mr. Billingsley, maybe I am close-minded, but if someone uses this newsgroup for commercial advertizements, than it is IMHO expected that people like me will simply mark that thread as readed and continue to next one. D will get exposure with, or without closed-source or non-free software projects. I am one of those developers who think that soon era of closed-source and non-free software will be over. I am pretty sure even You mister are using almost 50% of free-software at the moment. I am cross-platform developer, system administrator, and DBA, with more than 13 years of working experience, and I am developing software for different plaforms. Yes, I am using GNU/Linux, multiple versions of Windows (TM), Solaris and few other Unices, and I have developed closed-cource applications as well. :) About open-source, and D popularization: IMHO open-source, free software named GDC propagated D more than ANY other, commercial D project. I would dare to say it propagated D more than _ALL_ commercial D projects TOGETHER! Why? How? - It made MacOSX developers "feel" D, use it, and develop their projects in this wanderfull language - same about any other platform GDC currently works on, which almost about ALL platforms! :) After all, If I say that I am not interested in such types of projects and do not look at them on announcements - that is my business, isn't it? I apologize if I somehow offended You or somebody else. -- ........... Dejan Lekic http://dejan.lekic.org
Aug 12 2005
what commercial d projects? Dejan Lekic wrote:Mr. Billingsley, maybe I am close-minded, but if someone uses this newsgroup for commercial advertizements, than it is IMHO expected that people like me will simply mark that thread as readed and continue to next one. D will get exposure with, or without closed-source or non-free software projects. I am one of those developers who think that soon era of closed-source and non-free software will be over. I am pretty sure even You mister are using almost 50% of free-software at the moment. I am cross-platform developer, system administrator, and DBA, with more than 13 years of working experience, and I am developing software for different plaforms. Yes, I am using GNU/Linux, multiple versions of Windows (TM), Solaris and few other Unices, and I have developed closed-cource applications as well. :) About open-source, and D popularization: IMHO open-source, free software named GDC propagated D more than ANY other, commercial D project. I would dare to say it propagated D more than _ALL_ commercial D projects TOGETHER! Why? How? - It made MacOSX developers "feel" D, use it, and develop their projects in this wanderfull language - same about any other platform GDC currently works on, which almost about ALL platforms! :) After all, If I say that I am not interested in such types of projects and do not look at them on announcements - that is my business, isn't it? I apologize if I somehow offended You or somebody else.
Aug 12 2005
"Dejan Lekic" <leka entropy.tmok.com> wrote in message news:ddj572$1c9d$1 digitaldaemon.com...Mr. Billingsley, maybe I am close-minded, but if someone uses this newsgroup for commercial advertizements, than it is IMHO expected that people like me will simply mark that thread as readed and continue to next one. D will get exposure with, or without closed-source or non-free software projects. I am one of those developers who think that soon era of closed-source and non-free software will be over. I am pretty sure even You mister are using almost 50% of free-software at the moment. I am cross-platform developer, system administrator, and DBA, with more than 13 years of working experience, and I am developing software for different plaforms. Yes, I am using GNU/Linux, multiple versions of Windows (TM), Solaris and few other Unices, and I have developed closed-cource applications as well. :) About open-source, and D popularization: IMHO open-source, free software named GDC propagated D more than ANY other, commercial D project. I would dare to say it propagated D more than _ALL_ commercial D projects TOGETHER! Why? How? - It made MacOSX developers "feel" D, use it, and develop their projects in this wanderfull language - same about any other platform GDC currently works on, which almost about ALL platforms! :) After all, If I say that I am not interested in such types of projects and do not look at them on announcements - that is my business, isn't it? I apologize if I somehow offended You or somebody else.Fair enough. I'm used to the typical Linuxheads with huge egoes who won't touch anything un-Linux with a ten foot pole, and who don't give anything that isn't open-source any kind of credit. I believe that both open-source and closed-source can be used responsibly, and will not discredit or ignore a piece of software if it uses one or the other. You're right, I do use a lot of open-source programs, but I use a lot of closed-source ones as well, as how the program was developed does not necessarily dictate the quality or utility of the software.
Aug 13 2005
The licenses for DMD were set up so that both open and closed source developers can use it. Both are welcome, and both are welcome to post announcements here.
Aug 13 2005
Walter, I just wanted to note that I never said closed-source project announcements are not welcomed - it is not on me to say anyway since I am not the host. :) Regards -- ........... Dejan Lekic http://dejan.lekic.org
Aug 13 2005
"Dejan Lekic" <leka entropy.tmok.com> wrote in message news:ddldg5$bog$1 digitaldaemon.com...Walter, I just wanted to note that I never said closed-source project announcements are not welcomed - it is not on me to say anyway since I am not the host. :)Hey, no problem. It was a global comment I made, not directed at anyone.
Aug 13 2005
Just thought... should we anounce (should I say flood) every 0.000000001 versionYes, why not? I don't have to visit every site of the project to see the changelog. Besides, here are not 100 new procjets every month announced, the traffic is low. -- uno (unodgs tlen.pl)
Aug 12 2005
if its a usefull utility and not just someones hobby project, then WHY NOT? bobef wrote:Just thought... should we anounce (should I say flood) every 0.000000001 version change in our things here? Or once we announce something everyone interested can check our site (if there is such) for updates?
Aug 12 2005