• =?iso-8859-2?B?VG9tZWsgU293afFza2k=?= (6/6) Mar 19 2010 Will the multidimensional length operator make it into D2? If so, would ...
• bearophile (5/7) Mar 20 2010 In my opinion, if you write a large amount of code on the base of a feat...
• =?iso-8859-2?B?VG9tZWsgU293afFza2k=?= (3/6) Mar 20 2010 You're right. That's why I was asking. Thx 4 info.

=?iso-8859-2?B?VG9tZWsgU293afFza2k=?= <just ask.me> writes:

Will the multidimensional length operator make it into D2? If so, would  
the syntax be any different from  
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3474 ? I'd like to gear my  
matrix code to match the syntax not to change too much for the new DMD  
release.


Tomek

bearophile <bearophileHUGS lycos.com> writes:

Tomek S.:

 Will the multidimensional length operator make it into D2?

I think the design by Don has being accepted for D2. Don is usually able to
give a smooth design to his inventions.


I'd like to gear my matrix code to match the syntax not to change too much for
the new DMD release.<

In my opinion, if you write a large amount of code on the base of a feature
that's not fully developed yet then you risk wasting some of your time.

Bye,
bearophile

=?iso-8859-2?B?VG9tZWsgU293afFza2k=?= <just ask.me> writes:

Dnia 20-03-2010 o 14:34:31 bearophile <bearophileHUGS lycos.com>  =

napisa=B3(a):

 In my opinion, if you write a large amount of code on the base of a  =

 feature that's not fully developed yet then you risk wasting some of  =

 your time.

You're right. That's why I was asking. Thx 4 info.