• Yuxuan Shui (5/5) May 09 2017 I wondered if I can turn struct that defines opApply into ranges.
• Stefan Koch (4/10) May 09 2017 This "conversion" relies on fibers which need heavy runtime

Yuxuan Shui <yshuiv7 gmail.com> writes:

I wondered if I can turn struct that defines opApply into ranges.

And it turns out to be surprisingly easy:

https://gist.github.com/yshui/716cfe987c89997760cabc2c951ca430

Maybe we can phase out opApply support in foreach? ;)

BTW, is there a way to get the "element type" from .opApply?

Stefan Koch <uplink.coder googlemail.com> writes:

On Tuesday, 9 May 2017 at 17:23:36 UTC, Yuxuan Shui wrote:
 I wondered if I can turn struct that defines opApply into 
 ranges.

 And it turns out to be surprisingly easy:

 https://gist.github.com/yshui/716cfe987c89997760cabc2c951ca430

 Maybe we can phase out opApply support in foreach? ;)

 BTW, is there a way to get the "element type" from .opApply?

This "conversion" relies on fibers which need heavy runtime 
support.
So no, opApply still has it's place.