www.digitalmars.com         C & C++   DMDScript  

digitalmars.D - Review needed for the EnumSet template

reply "BBasile" <bb.temp gmx.com> writes:
Memebers should be notified.

https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/3623

It's not a big stuff but it's neither a small addition.
The thing is there.
Sep 02 2015
parent reply "Enamex" <enamex+d outlook.com> writes:
On Thursday, 3 September 2015 at 00:12:06 UTC, BBasile wrote:

 Memebers should be notified.

 https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/3623

 It's not a big stuff but it's neither a small addition.
 The thing is there.


Slightly tangential question: in your "superset" enumset package, 
what's the use of 'static' annotation on a free function (was the 
first function I saw in the file, I believe)?
Sep 02 2015
parent "BBasile" <bb.temp gmx.com> writes:
On Thursday, 3 September 2015 at 05:39:03 UTC, Enamex wrote:

 On Thursday, 3 September 2015 at 00:12:06 UTC, BBasile wrote:

 Memebers should be notified.

 https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/3623

 It's not a big stuff but it's neither a small addition.
 The thing is there.


 Slightly tangential question: in your "superset" enumset 
 package, what's the use of 'static' annotation on a free 
 function (was the first function I saw in the file, I believe)?


Nothing, gotta remove them. This is an artifact from the time i 
began to learn D:  I thought that to make a function available at 
CT 'static' was required, which is obviously wrong...The fact is 
that 'static' is here a no-op (e.g its does nothing on the 
signature), just like when someone declares a static global 
something.
Sep 03 2015