digitalmars.D - Potential regression?
- H. S. Teoh (13/13) May 02 2019 After updating my dmd toolchain to the latest git master today, I
- Rainer Schuetze (4/17) May 05 2019 Parallel marking by the GC has recently been merged into master which
- H. S. Teoh (14/31) May 14 2019 Turns out, this problem is quite elusive. Running it with
- Exil (3/36) May 14 2019 It's hard to follow your posts, they are creating new threads
- H. S. Teoh (8/10) May 14 2019 It's not a problem on my end, the problem is the Mailman gateway that
- Seb (5/14) May 14 2019 For references:
- H. S. Teoh (10/25) May 15 2019 It's an added burden to use a different MUA just for NNTP, or to use the
After updating my dmd toolchain to the latest git master today, I started getting strange random program lockups. At first I thought it was caused by passing the wrong druntime options (--DRT-*) that's incompatible with the latest druntime, but then I started seeing messages of this sort: core.sync.exception.SyncError (0): Unable to unlock mutex. The program in question uses std.parallelism.parallel to parallelize a bunch of I/O-heavy tasks. It has been working fine for many months now. Did something break recently in std.parallelism or the core.sync.* utilities that it presumably uses under the hood? T -- Just because you can, doesn't mean you should.
May 02 2019
On 03/05/2019 01:57, H. S. Teoh wrote:After updating my dmd toolchain to the latest git master today, I started getting strange random program lockups. At first I thought it was caused by passing the wrong druntime options (--DRT-*) that's incompatible with the latest druntime, but then I started seeing messages of this sort: core.sync.exception.SyncError (0): Unable to unlock mutex. The program in question uses std.parallelism.parallel to parallelize a bunch of I/O-heavy tasks. It has been working fine for many months now. Did something break recently in std.parallelism or the core.sync.* utilities that it presumably uses under the hood?Parallel marking by the GC has recently been merged into master which might create a couple of extra threads. Is this causing the failures? Please try disabling it with --DRT-gcopt=parallel:0
May 05 2019
On Sun, May 05, 2019 at 11:18:43AM +0200, Rainer Schuetze via Digitalmars-d wrote:On 03/05/2019 01:57, H. S. Teoh wrote:Turns out, this problem is quite elusive. Running it with --DRT-gcopt=parallel:0 *seems* to make the problem go away, but it's hard to tell because sometimes it takes 10-20 trials before a lockup happens, so I'm not 100% confident --DRT-gcopt=parallel:0 fixes the problem -- I might have just gotten lucky so far. But at least, I've yet to see a lockup with it, whereas I've seen a few lockups when running without it, so perhaps this is the problem? I wish I could narrow it down, but it's going to be hard because it's so unpredictable -- I couldn't use dustmite to reduce the code since the problem can't be reliably reproduced. T -- It is not the employer who pays the wages. Employers only handle the money. It is the customer who pays the wages. -- Henry FordAfter updating my dmd toolchain to the latest git master today, I started getting strange random program lockups. At first I thought it was caused by passing the wrong druntime options (--DRT-*) that's incompatible with the latest druntime, but then I started seeing messages of this sort: core.sync.exception.SyncError (0): Unable to unlock mutex. The program in question uses std.parallelism.parallel to parallelize a bunch of I/O-heavy tasks. It has been working fine for many months now. Did something break recently in std.parallelism or the core.sync.* utilities that it presumably uses under the hood?Parallel marking by the GC has recently been merged into master which might create a couple of extra threads. Is this causing the failures? Please try disabling it with --DRT-gcopt=parallel:0
May 14 2019
On Wednesday, 15 May 2019 at 00:17:26 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:On Sun, May 05, 2019 at 11:18:43AM +0200, Rainer Schuetze via Digitalmars-d wrote:It's hard to follow your posts, they are creating new threads instead of being in the thread you are replying to.On 03/05/2019 01:57, H. S. Teoh wrote:Turns out, this problem is quite elusive. Running it with --DRT-gcopt=parallel:0 *seems* to make the problem go away, but it's hard to tell because sometimes it takes 10-20 trials before a lockup happens, so I'm not 100% confident --DRT-gcopt=parallel:0 fixes the problem -- I might have just gotten lucky so far. But at least, I've yet to see a lockup with it, whereas I've seen a few lockups when running without it, so perhaps this is the problem? I wish I could narrow it down, but it's going to be hard because it's so unpredictable -- I couldn't use dustmite to reduce the code since the problem can't be reliably reproduced. TAfter updating my dmd toolchain to the latest git master today, I started getting strange random program lockups. At first I thought it was caused by passing the wrong druntime options (--DRT-*) that's incompatible with the latest druntime, but then I started seeing messages of this sort: core.sync.exception.SyncError (0): Unable to unlock mutex. The program in question uses std.parallelism.parallel to parallelize a bunch of I/O-heavy tasks. It has been working fine for many months now. Did something break recently in std.parallelism or the core.sync.* utilities that it presumably uses under the hood?Parallel marking by the GC has recently been merged into master which might create a couple of extra threads. Is this causing the failures? Please try disabling it with --DRT-gcopt=parallel:0
May 14 2019
On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 01:09:39AM +0000, Exil via Digitalmars-d wrote: [...]It's hard to follow your posts, they are creating new threads instead of being in the thread you are replying to.It's not a problem on my end, the problem is the Mailman gateway that interfaces with the NNTP server. It's not translating the message IDs correctly. Please file a bug against Mailman. T -- Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence. -- Napoleon Bonaparte
May 14 2019
On Wednesday, 15 May 2019 at 05:39:53 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 01:09:39AM +0000, Exil via Digitalmars-d wrote: [...]For references: https://github.com/CyberShadow/DFeed/issues/99 Though of course you could just switch from the mailing list to the forum or NNTP.It's hard to follow your posts, they are creating new threads instead of being in the thread you are replying to.It's not a problem on my end, the problem is the Mailman gateway that interfaces with the NNTP server. It's not translating the message IDs correctly. Please file a bug against Mailman. T
May 14 2019
On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 05:48:06AM +0000, Seb via Digitalmars-d wrote:On Wednesday, 15 May 2019 at 05:39:53 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:[...]On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 01:09:39AM +0000, Exil via Digitalmars-d wrote: [...]It's hard to follow your posts, they are creating new threads instead of being in the thread you are replying to.It's not a problem on my end, the problem is the Mailman gateway that interfaces with the NNTP server. It's not translating the message IDs correctly. Please file a bug against Mailman.For references: https://github.com/CyberShadow/DFeed/issues/99 Though of course you could just switch from the mailing list to the forum or NNTP.It's an added burden to use a different MUA just for NNTP, or to use the inefficient resource hog of a browser just for this. Since the mailing list is an "officially" supported interface, it's technically not really *my* responsibility to fix a problem in software that isn't under my control. T -- Error: Keyboard not attached. Press F1 to continue. -- Yoon Ha Lee, CONLANG
May 15 2019