• Jonas Drewsen (3/3) Apr 15 2013 http://www.meetingcpp.com/index.php/br/items/a-look-at-c14-and-beyond-pa...
• Timon Gehr (11/14) Apr 15 2013 They still ban 'new', lambdas, exceptions, comparing pointers to

"Jonas Drewsen" <nospam4321 hotmail.com > writes:

http://www.meetingcpp.com/index.php/br/items/a-look-at-c14-and-beyond-papers-part-3.html

Item N3597

/Jonas

Timon Gehr <timon.gehr gmx.ch> writes:

On 04/15/2013 10:17 AM, Jonas Drewsen wrote:
 http://www.meetingcpp.com/index.php/br/items/a-look-at-c14-and-beyond-papers-part-3.html


 Item N3597

 /Jonas

They still ban 'new', lambdas, exceptions, comparing pointers to 
determine whether they reside in the same memory block, etc.

(DMD still bans closures, but that is a bug.)

If I understand it correctly, their rules do not support their 
motivating example, based on "implementation complexity" concerns. 
Building interpreters is not hard.

Item N3582 (return type deduction) is also present in D. Though they 
have to account for the strange special rules of decltype and auto. They 
introduce a wholly new notion of decltype(auto) type deduction in order 
to support what we call auto ref return.