• =?iso-8859-1?Q?Robert_M._M=FCnch?= (6/6) May 28 2018 Might be interesting to checkout to find some optimization potential:
• rikki cattermole (2/5) May 28 2018 https://github.com/dyu/ffi-overhead/issues/5
• rikki cattermole (4/10) May 31 2018 With ldc, we are closer to zig now (equal/better), but c++ is still 8ms

=?iso-8859-1?Q?Robert_M._M=FCnch?= <robert.muench saphirion.com> writes:

Might be interesting to checkout to find some optimization potential:

https://github.com/dyu/ffi-overhead


-- 
Robert M. Münch
http://www.saphirion.com
smarter | better | faster

rikki cattermole <rikki cattermole.co.nz> writes:

On 28/05/2018 10:16 PM, Robert M. Münch wrote:
 Might be interesting to checkout to find some optimization potential:
 
 https://github.com/dyu/ffi-overhead

https://github.com/dyu/ffi-overhead/issues/5

rikki cattermole <rikki cattermole.co.nz> writes:

On 28/05/2018 10:19 PM, rikki cattermole wrote:
 On 28/05/2018 10:16 PM, Robert M. Münch wrote:
 Might be interesting to checkout to find some optimization potential:

 https://github.com/dyu/ffi-overhead

 
 https://github.com/dyu/ffi-overhead/issues/5

With ldc, we are closer to zig now (equal/better), but c++ is still 8ms 
better than us.

Either way we are better than Rust :)