www.digitalmars.com         C & C++   DMDScript  

digitalmars.D - Comparing the c ffi overhead on various programming languages

reply =?iso-8859-1?Q?Robert_M._M=FCnch?= <robert.muench saphirion.com> writes:
Might be interesting to checkout to find some optimization potential:

https://github.com/dyu/ffi-overhead


-- 
Robert M. MŁnch
http://www.saphirion.com
smarter | better | faster
May 28 2018
parent reply rikki cattermole <rikki cattermole.co.nz> writes:
On 28/05/2018 10:16 PM, Robert M. M√ľnch wrote:
 Might be interesting to checkout to find some optimization potential:
 
 https://github.com/dyu/ffi-overhead
https://github.com/dyu/ffi-overhead/issues/5
May 28 2018
parent rikki cattermole <rikki cattermole.co.nz> writes:
On 28/05/2018 10:19 PM, rikki cattermole wrote:
 On 28/05/2018 10:16 PM, Robert M. M√ľnch wrote:
 Might be interesting to checkout to find some optimization potential:

 https://github.com/dyu/ffi-overhead
https://github.com/dyu/ffi-overhead/issues/5
With ldc, we are closer to zig now (equal/better), but c++ is still 8ms better than us. Either way we are better than Rust :)
May 31 2018