digitalmars.D - iftype
- bobef (4/4) May 22 2005 I just thought this morning would't be something like
- Walter (5/9) May 22 2005 But it isn't var:int, it's type:int.
- bobef (3/15) May 22 2005 This is my point too.
- Craig Black (4/4) May 23 2005 A little off topic here, but I think that the static if and iftype (howe...
- Ben Hinkle (6/10) May 22 2005 what about the
I just thought this morning would't be something like if (var istype int) more reasonable than iftype (var : int)
May 22 2005
"bobef" <bobef_member pathlink.com> wrote in message news:d6pg4l$1i12$1 digitaldaemon.com...I just thought this morning would't be something like if (var istype int) more reasonable than iftype (var : int)But it isn't var:int, it's type:int. Nevertheless, my dissatisfaction with iftype is it's a separate statement. I think you're right in that it ought to be an expression.
May 22 2005
bobef <bobef_member pathlink.com> In article <d6phum$1j4m$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Walter says..."bobef" <bobef_member pathlink.com> wrote in message news:d6pg4l$1i12$1 digitaldaemon.com...I meant it is variable type :)I just thought this morning would't be something like if (var istype int) more reasonable than iftype (var : int)But it isn't var:int, it's type:int.Nevertheless, my dissatisfaction with iftype is it's a separate statement. I think you're right in that it ought to be an expression.This is my point too.
May 22 2005
A little off topic here, but I think that the static if and iftype (however it is implemented) are awesome features! I am so impressed with the progress of D. Good job, Walter! Good job, D community! Keep it up. -Craig
May 23 2005
"bobef" <bobef_member pathlink.com> wrote in message news:d6pg4l$1i12$1 digitaldaemon.com...I just thought this morning would't be something like if (var istype int) more reasonable than iftype (var : int)what about the iftype ( foo bar : baz) syntax? I've been using the simple form iftype(foo : baz) up to now but keeping that general form would be nice.
May 22 2005