digitalmars.D - [OT: posting conventions]
- Matthew (31/31) Mar 07 2005 I remember we had a concerted debate a year or so ago about posting
- Vathix (1/1) Mar 07 2005 I agree. lol
- Kris (2/3) Mar 07 2005 ROFL!
- xs0 (5/10) Mar 07 2005 By the timing I guess that was addressed to me :) Sorry, I do usually
- Matthew (5/17) Mar 07 2005 Could've been. I honestly don't know, and it wasn't meant as a personal
- Walter (7/16) Mar 07 2005 On the other hand, when the posts eventually wind up in the 'archives'
- Matthew (6/28) Mar 07 2005 Yes, less. Agreed. Just not nothing.
- zwang (2/40) Mar 07 2005 I recommend you to try Thunderbird. It takes a few minutes to set thing...
- Nick Sabalausky (17/28) Mar 09 2005 I tried Thunderbird a little while ago, and I liked the "underlining
- Georg Wrede (7/21) Mar 08 2005 Thunderbird, that's what I have on both Windows and Linux.
- =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Anders_F_Bj=F6rklund?= (4/6) Mar 08 2005 Even available in e.g. Swedish, for us foreigners...
I remember we had a concerted debate a year or so ago about posting etiquette. I think the consensus was (sensibly) that we don't need, in this friendly place, prescriptions, proscriptions and all manner of pedantic strictures to suppress our creativity. There is just one thing I'd like to raise, however. In order to manage the increasing volume of posts on this and other groups, I tend to hide read messages. As such, when posts come containing answer only, it's a right royal pain to find to what the hell they're replying. Unless I'm feeling particularly philanthropic, I just junk them. So, I'd ask that the one or two people that have been doing this keep at least a rism of the previous post. I can't believe I'm the only one who has this same reaction, so you're probably doing yourself at least as big a favour as you're doing me/us. Cheers -- Matthew Wilson Author: "Imperfect C++", Addison-Wesley, 2004 (http://www.imperfectcplusplus.com) Contributing editor, C/C++ Users Journal (http://www.synesis.com.au/articles.html#columns) Director, Synesis Software (www.synesis.com.au) STLSoft moderator (http://www.stlsoft.org) Synesis Software Pty Ltd P.O.Box 125 Waverley New South Wales, 2024 Australia -----------------------------------------------------
Mar 07 2005
In article <opsnapq5jmkcck4r esi>, Vathix says...I agree. lolROFL!
Mar 07 2005
In order to manage the increasing volume of posts on this and other groups, I tend to hide read messages. As such, when posts come containing answer only, it's a right royal pain to find to what the hell they're replying. Unless I'm feeling particularly philanthropic, I just junk them.By the timing I guess that was addressed to me :) Sorry, I do usually include a quote.. OTOH, it is also annoying to have to scroll like 250 lines of quotes to see a line of reply, so that might be something to watch for as well.. xs0
Mar 07 2005
"xs0" <xs0 xs0.com> wrote in message news:d0j0k8$thu$1 digitaldaemon.com...Could've been. I honestly don't know, and it wasn't meant as a personal go at anyone. Just a tip for increasing one's readership ... ;)In order to manage the increasing volume of posts on this and other groups, I tend to hide read messages. As such, when posts come containing answer only, it's a right royal pain to find to what the hell they're replying. Unless I'm feeling particularly philanthropic, I just junk them.By the timing I guess that was addressed to me :) Sorry, I do usually include a quote..OTOH, it is also annoying to have to scroll like 250 lines of quotes to see a line of reply, so that might be something to watch for as well..Indeed. Something I am guilty of, along with many others. ;$
Mar 07 2005
"Matthew" <admin stlsoft.dot.dot.dot.dot.org> wrote in message news:d0ivh5$s78$1 digitaldaemon.com...In order to manage the increasing volume of posts on this and other groups, I tend to hide read messages. As such, when posts come containing answer only, it's a right royal pain to find to what the hell they're replying. Unless I'm feeling particularly philanthropic, I just junk them. So, I'd ask that the one or two people that have been doing this keep at least a rism of the previous post. I can't believe I'm the only one who has this same reaction, so you're probably doing yourself at least as big a favour as you're doing me/us.On the other hand, when the posts eventually wind up in the 'archives' pages, long quotes tend to be annoying. So I was going to suggest less quoting <g>. What newsreader are you using? Me, I use Outlook Express, which bolds unread messages. Makes it easy.
Mar 07 2005
"Walter" <newshound digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:d0j77h$158t$2 digitaldaemon.com..."Matthew" <admin stlsoft.dot.dot.dot.dot.org> wrote in message news:d0ivh5$s78$1 digitaldaemon.com...Yes, less. Agreed. Just not nothing.In order to manage the increasing volume of posts on this and other groups, I tend to hide read messages. As such, when posts come containing answer only, it's a right royal pain to find to what the hell they're replying. Unless I'm feeling particularly philanthropic, I just junk them. So, I'd ask that the one or two people that have been doing this keep at least a rism of the previous post. I can't believe I'm the only one who has this same reaction, so you're probably doing yourself at least as big a favour as you're doing me/us.On the other hand, when the posts eventually wind up in the 'archives' pages, long quotes tend to be annoying. So I was going to suggest less quoting <g>.What newsreader are you using? Me, I use Outlook Express, which bolds unread messages. Makes it easy.Yes, I am using the same execrable filth. I've been planning to upgrade to something decent for years, but there's thing pesky thing called time ...
Mar 07 2005
Matthew wrote:"Walter" <newshound digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:d0j77h$158t$2 digitaldaemon.com...I recommend you to try Thunderbird. It takes a few minutes to set things up."Matthew" <admin stlsoft.dot.dot.dot.dot.org> wrote in message news:d0ivh5$s78$1 digitaldaemon.com...Yes, less. Agreed. Just not nothing.In order to manage the increasing volume of posts on this and other groups, I tend to hide read messages. As such, when posts come containing answer only, it's a right royal pain to find to what the hell they're replying. Unless I'm feeling particularly philanthropic, I just junk them. So, I'd ask that the one or two people that have been doing this keep at least a rism of the previous post. I can't believe I'm the only one who has this same reaction, so you're probably doing yourself at least as big a favour as you're doing me/us.On the other hand, when the posts eventually wind up in the 'archives' pages, long quotes tend to be annoying. So I was going to suggest less quoting <g>.What newsreader are you using? Me, I use Outlook Express, which bolds unread messages. Makes it easy.Yes, I am using the same execrable filth. I've been planning to upgrade to something decent for years, but there's thing pesky thing called time ...
Mar 07 2005
I tried Thunderbird a little while ago, and I liked the "underlining partially read threads" and I like the way it handles quotes, but there were some annoyances that drove me back to Outlook Express after a couple weeks: - There's no (apperent) way to make it stop turning *word* into bold, /word/ into italic, and _word_ into underline. I like my plain text to be plain text, thank you. - The left pane insists on abbreviating "digitalmars.D" to "d.D", and "digitalmars.D.bugs" to "d.D.bugs", etc. Even when there's plenty of room for the full name. - Almost every time I open a newsgroup, it chooses a random thread to "expand all". - I don't like Mark As Read and Mark Thread as Read being in a sub-menu of the right-click menu. - My email server redirects to a different name, so when I tried to send mail encrypted, Thunderbird kept pestering me about it and didn't allow any "always ok for that domain" option. - Email Message Filters seem to be extremely broken.I recommend you to try Thunderbird. It takes a few minutes to set things up.What newsreader are you using? Me, I use Outlook Express, which bolds unread messages. Makes it easy.Yes, I am using the same execrable filth. I've been planning to upgrade to something decent for years, but there's thing pesky thing called time ...
Mar 09 2005
"Nick Sabalausky" <z a.a> wrote in message news:d0n26i$2das$1 digitaldaemon.com...I tried Thunderbird a little while ago, and I liked the "underlining partially read threads" and I like the way it handles quotes, but thereweresome annoyances that drove me back to Outlook Express after a coupleweeks: I have a couple complaints with OE's newsreader, mainly it gets the unread messages count maddeningly wrong, but overall it's fine. It's infinitely more useful than web forum software like what slashdot uses.
Mar 09 2005
Nick Sabalausky wrote:I tried Thunderbird a little while ago, and I liked the "underlining partially read threads" and I like the way it handles quotes, but there were some annoyances that drove me back to Outlook Express after a couple weeks: - There's no (apperent) way to make it stop turning *word* into bold, /word/ into italic, and _word_ into underline. I like my plain text to be plain text, thank you.One simple solution is to install the "Quote Colors" extension. You might also tweak the pref.js directly.- The left pane insists on abbreviating "digitalmars.D" to "d.D", and "digitalmars.D.bugs" to "d.D.bugs", etc. Even when there's plenty of room for the full name.True. However, I like this feature.- Almost every time I open a newsgroup, it chooses a random thread to "expand all".It never occurred to me. Weird.- I don't like Mark As Read and Mark Thread as Read being in a sub-menu of the right-click menu."M" and "R" are the keyboard shortcuts for these two tasks respectively.- My email server redirects to a different name, so when I tried to send mail encrypted, Thunderbird kept pestering me about it and didn't allow any "always ok for that domain" option.I can understand how annoying this is.- Email Message Filters seem to be extremely broken."extremely broken"? Is it an exaggeration? I find email filters quite usable. Maybe my filters are not complicated enough to trigger the bug you found.
Mar 09 2005
Matthew wrote:"Walter" <newshound digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:d0j77h$158t$2 digitaldaemon.com...Thunderbird, that's what I have on both Windows and Linux. No hassle with install. Easy-beasy. And while _YOU_BOTH_ are at it, get Firefox for surfing. You'll get the time "wasted" back within a week, with interest. Getting and installing them isn't much more work than getting Acrobat Reader, or Flash, etc. I'd be scared to death using OE, or IE."Matthew" <admin stlsoft.dot.dot.dot.dot.org> wrote in message news:d0ivh5$s78$1 digitaldaemon.com...Yes, I am using the same execrable filth. I've been planning to upgrade to something decent for years, but there's thing pesky thing called timeIn order to manage the increasing volume of posts on this and other groups, I tend to hide read messages.What newsreader are you using? Me, I use Outlook Express, which bolds unread messages. Makes it easy.
Mar 08 2005
Georg Wrede wrote:Thunderbird, that's what I have on both Windows and Linux.And Mac OS X, too. (posting this, using Thunderbird)No hassle with install. Easy-beasy.Even available in e.g. Swedish, for us foreigners... --anders
Mar 08 2005