c++.windows.32-bits - WinDBG support?
- =?iso-8859-1?Q?Robert_M=2E_M=FCnch?= (3/3) Apr 14 2008 Hi, I understood that it's possible to use WinDBG with DMC generated
- Walter Bright (2/6) Jun 16 2008 Compile with -g. But you need the windbg.exe that comes with DMC++.
- =?iso-8859-1?Q?Robert_M=2E_M=FCnch?= (8/9) Jun 16 2008 So, this is an older windbg.exe version? Are there are any plans to keep...
- Walter Bright (5/13) Jun 18 2008 Not when that one works fine! (It's expensive, time consuming, and hard
- =?iso-8859-1?Q?Robert_M=2E_M=FCnch?= (8/12) Jun 27 2008 Just of interest, how did you do a special WinDbg version? Did MS give y...
- Walter Bright (2/4) Oct 13 2008 No, I don't have source to it. It's just an older version of it.
- AndyC (4/4) Jul 03 2008 What is the best source of documentation for the DMC compatable
- Walter Bright (2/6) Oct 13 2008 There really isn't anything other that what you can find with google.
Hi, I understood that it's possible to use WinDBG with DMC generated files. How can I get WinDBG to recognize the source code? I only get the ASM output. Thanks Robert
Apr 14 2008
Robert M. Münch wrote:Hi, I understood that it's possible to use WinDBG with DMC generated files. How can I get WinDBG to recognize the source code? I only get the ASM output. Thanks RobertCompile with -g. But you need the windbg.exe that comes with DMC++.
Jun 16 2008
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 09:10:47 +0200, Walter Bright <newshound1 digitalmars.com> wrote:Compile with -g. But you need the windbg.exe that comes with DMC++.So, this is an older windbg.exe version? Are there are any plans to keep pace with windbg.exe development? -- Robert M. Münch Management & IT Freelancer http://www.robertmuench.de
Jun 16 2008
Robert M. Münch wrote:On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 09:10:47 +0200, Walter Bright <newshound1 digitalmars.com> wrote:Yes.Compile with -g. But you need the windbg.exe that comes with DMC++.So, this is an older windbg.exe version?Are there are any plans to keep pace with windbg.exe development?Not when that one works fine! (It's expensive, time consuming, and hard to see the benefit to try keep up with Microsoft's ever-changing and undocumented debug formats.)
Jun 18 2008
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 22:56:58 +0200, Walter Bright <newshound1 digitalmars.com> wrote:Just of interest, how did you do a special WinDbg version? Did MS give you source-access to it? -- Robert M. Münch Management & IT Freelancer http://www.robertmuench.deAre there are any plans to keep pace with windbg.exe development?Not when that one works fine! (It's expensive, time consuming, and hard to see the benefit to try keep up with Microsoft's ever-changing and undocumented debug formats.)
Jun 27 2008
Robert M. Münch wrote:Just of interest, how did you do a special WinDbg version? Did MS give you source-access to it?No, I don't have source to it. It's just an older version of it.
Oct 13 2008
What is the best source of documentation for the DMC compatable version of the debugger. I would like to implement it in the latest Eclipse/CDT to work the way it does in the old Symantec IDDE but I can't find complete docs. Any advice appreciated.
Jul 03 2008
AndyC wrote:What is the best source of documentation for the DMC compatable version of the debugger. I would like to implement it in the latest Eclipse/CDT to work the way it does in the old Symantec IDDE but I can't find complete docs. Any advice appreciated.There really isn't anything other that what you can find with google.
Oct 13 2008