c++.windows.32-bits - INVALID_SET_FILE_POINTER
- Robert M. Münch (9/9) Dec 21 2002 Hi, does someone know where to find this constant? The MSDN docs state t...
- Daniel Fazekas (13/22) Dec 21 2002 It is defined as follows in winbase.h. That is, in the Platform SDK, and...
- Matthew Wilson (6/31) Dec 22 2002 I don't suppose Walter, or anyone else, has a tool that can automaticall...
- Robert M. Münch (7/9) Dec 23 2002 Hi, I don't know.
- Matthew Wilson (6/15) Dec 27 2002 I'd be interested in this, but workload won't permit any input from me u...
- Christof Meerwald (11/30) Dec 27 2002 Maybe I am missing something here, but what's the problem with just usin...
- Robert M. Münch (6/11) Dec 27 2002 it
Hi, does someone know where to find this constant? The MSDN docs state that it should be defined in windows.h, which isn't the case for DMC. I can find the SetFilePointer function but not the return code. -- Robert M. Münch IT & Management Freelancer Mobile: +49 (0)177 2452 802 Fax : +49 (0)721 8408 9112 Web : http://www.robertmuench.de
Dec 21 2002
It is defined as follows in winbase.h. That is, in the Platform SDK, and not DM's winbase.h which lacks this definition. #define INVALID_SET_FILE_POINTER ((DWORD)-1) Rest assured, this isn't the only time you'll find a definition missing from the headers supplied with dm. :) You always should have a copy of the Platform SDK handy and just copy the appropriate definition from there. -- Daniel "Robert M. Münch" <robert.muench robertmuench.de> wrote in message news:au1pmb$2fr3$1 digitaldaemon.com...Hi, does someone know where to find this constant? The MSDN docs statethatit should be defined in windows.h, which isn't the case for DMC. I canfindthe SetFilePointer function but not the return code. -- Robert M. Münch IT & Management Freelancer Mobile: +49 (0)177 2452 802 Fax : +49 (0)721 8408 9112 Web : http://www.robertmuench.de
Dec 21 2002
I don't suppose Walter, or anyone else, has a tool that can automatically extract the DMC-compatible version of Platform SDK contents? "Daniel Fazekas" <fds mailbox.hu> wrote in message news:au26eg$2o9j$1 digitaldaemon.com...It is defined as follows in winbase.h. That is, in the Platform SDK, andnotDM's winbase.h which lacks this definition. #define INVALID_SET_FILE_POINTER ((DWORD)-1) Rest assured, this isn't the only time you'll find a definition missingfromthe headers supplied with dm. :) You always should have a copy of the Platform SDK handy and just copy the appropriate definition from there. -- Daniel "Robert M. Münch" <robert.muench robertmuench.de> wrote in message news:au1pmb$2fr3$1 digitaldaemon.com...Hi, does someone know where to find this constant? The MSDN docs statethatit should be defined in windows.h, which isn't the case for DMC. I canfindthe SetFilePointer function but not the return code. -- Robert M. Münch IT & Management Freelancer Mobile: +49 (0)177 2452 802 Fax : +49 (0)721 8408 9112 Web : http://www.robertmuench.de
Dec 22 2002
"Matthew Wilson" <dmd synesis.com.au> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:au5a4v$1q4c$1 digitaldaemon.com...I don't suppose Walter, or anyone else, has a tool that can automatically extract the DMC-compatible version of Platform SDK contents?Hi, I don't know. But how about a community driven process? I'm sure quite a lot of us have written/extended the header files. So how could we all merge these together to create a Platform SDK compatible set of headers over time? Any idea? Robert
Dec 23 2002
I'd be interested in this, but workload won't permit any input from me until perhaps March! Sorry. "Robert M. Münch" <robert.muench robertmuench.de> wrote in message news:au6tos$2v3r$1 digitaldaemon.com..."Matthew Wilson" <dmd synesis.com.au> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:au5a4v$1q4c$1 digitaldaemon.com...automaticallyI don't suppose Walter, or anyone else, has a tool that cantogetherextract the DMC-compatible version of Platform SDK contents?Hi, I don't know. But how about a community driven process? I'm sure quite a lot of us have written/extended the header files. So how could we all merge theseto create a Platform SDK compatible set of headers over time? Any idea? Robert
Dec 27 2002
On Fri, 27 Dec 2002 22:26:54 +1100, Matthew Wilson wrote:I'd be interested in this, but workload won't permit any input from me until perhaps March! Sorry. "Robert M. Münch" <robert.muench robertmuench.de> wrote in message news:au6tos$2v3r$1 digitaldaemon.com...Maybe I am missing something here, but what's the problem with just using the Platform SDK? (AFAIK the most difficult part is deleting the old SDK headers included in DMC). See http://cmeerw.org/prog/dm/ms_sdk.html for a description of how I got it to work (the page still needs some work...) bye, Christof -- http://cmeerw.org JID: cmeerw jabber.at mailto cmeerw at web.de ...and what have you contributed to the Net?"Matthew Wilson" <dmd synesis.com.au> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:au5a4v$1q4c$1 digitaldaemon.com...automaticallyI don't suppose Walter, or anyone else, has a tool that cantogetherextract the DMC-compatible version of Platform SDK contents?Hi, I don't know. But how about a community driven process? I'm sure quite a lot of us have written/extended the header files. So how could we all merge theseto create a Platform SDK compatible set of headers over time? Any idea? Robert
Dec 27 2002
"Robert M. Münch" <robert.muench robertmuench.de> "Christof Meerwald" <cmeerw web.de> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:aui4gr$1os1$1 digitaldaemon.com...Maybe I am missing something here, but what's the problem with just using the Platform SDK? (AFAIK the most difficult part is deleting the old SDK headers included in DMC). See http://cmeerw.org/prog/dm/ms_sdk.html for a description of how I gotitto work (the page still needs some work...)Hi, seems more like I'm missing something ;-)). I'll try your approach. If this works out than of course we should use the Platform SDK stuff directly provided by MS. Robert
Dec 27 2002