c++.windows.32-bits - Actuallity of Windows 32 support?
- Robert M. Münch (13/13) Dec 30 2001 Hi, I just browsed through the include files to see if these all were
- Walter (6/19) Dec 31 2001 You're correct, Digital Mars does need a license to redistribute those f...
- Robert M. Münch (6/9) Dec 31 2001 files
Hi, I just browsed through the include files to see if these all were created from scratch. The normal includes are really compact. Than I saw that all the Win32 stuff are the includes provided by Microsoft. The years indicated are around 1996, are these still the most actual ones or did Micorsoft update them? How is further support for these headers realized? IMO the headers are copyrighted, right? So Walter always needs to get a license for these files? -- Robert M. Münch IT & Management Freelancer Mobile: +49 (0)177 2452 802 Fax : +49 (0)721 8408 9112 Web : http://www.robertmuench.de
Dec 30 2001
You're correct, Digital Mars does need a license to redistribute those files with the Microsoft copyright in them. Microsoft was kind enough to grant Digital Mars the necessary license. "Robert M. Münch" <robert.muench robertmuench.de> wrote in message news:a0nok1$ke4$1 digitaldaemon.com...Hi, I just browsed through the include files to see if these all were created from scratch. The normal includes are really compact. Than I saw that all the Win32 stuff are the includes provided by Microsoft. The years indicated are around 1996, are these still the most actual ones or did Micorsoft update them? How is further support for these headers realized? IMO the headers are copyrighted, right? So Walter always needs to get a license for thesefiles?-- Robert M. Münch IT & Management Freelancer Mobile: +49 (0)177 2452 802 Fax : +49 (0)721 8408 9112 Web : http://www.robertmuench.de
Dec 31 2001
"Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:a0p83u$1h3i$1 digitaldaemon.com...You're correct, Digital Mars does need a license to redistribute thosefileswith the Microsoft copyright in them. Microsoft was kind enough to grant Digital Mars the necessary license.Hi, I hope they don't charge you anything for it (or if: that's it's not to much). And these are the most actual ones? Not that I care to much, because it seems that DMC++ can handle most Win32 code just for interest. Robert
Dec 31 2001
"Robert M. Münch" <robert.muench robertmuench.de> wrote in message news:a0pi6s$1mjr$1 digitaldaemon.com..."Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:a0p83u$1h3i$1 digitaldaemon.com...toYou're correct, Digital Mars does need a license to redistribute thosefileswith the Microsoft copyright in them. Microsoft was kind enough to grant Digital Mars the necessary license.Hi, I hope they don't charge you anything for it (or if: that's it's notmuch). And these are the most actual ones? Not that I care to much,becauseit seems that DMC++ can handle most Win32 code just for interest. RobertMicrosoft keeps adding to them, but that doesn't make the earlier ones obsolete. Changing any of the existing API functions is beyond anyone's capability!
Dec 31 2001
Microsoft keeps adding to them, but that doesn't make the earlier ones obsolete. Changing any of the existing API functions is beyond anyone's capability!I don't use many new features in the api now, but if I use some in the future, maybe DMC++ doesn't support it?
Jan 05 2002
"Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> "danny" <danny server.hftc.com> wrote in message news:a18tf6$2236$1 digitaldaemon.com...Since DMC++ supports the interface conventions to the API, and is binary compatible with VC++ data structures, I don't see a reason why it wouldn't support it (although you may need to add in a declaration in a header file).Microsoft keeps adding to them, but that doesn't make the earlier ones obsolete. Changing any of the existing API functions is beyond anyone's capability!I don't use many new features in the api now, but if I use some in the future, maybe DMC++ doesn't support it?
Jan 06 2002