www.digitalmars.com         C & C++   DMDScript  

c++.stlsoft - properties_file

reply dcw <dogged.code.warrior gmail.com> writes:
Apropos this StackOverflow item -
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/874052/properties-file-library-for-c-or-c -
is there a major reason why platformstl::properties_file uses
basic_string_view, rather than basic_string? My reasons are given in that post.

Is it possible to change it so that std::string is the default, and string_view
can be had by specialisation?
May 23 2009
parent "Matthew Wilson" <matthew hat.stlsoft.dot.org> writes:
Not a bad point. I'll add it to the list

Thanks

P.S. May I ask how you came to hear about STLSoft, and what you're using it for?

"dcw" <dogged.code.warrior gmail.com> wrote in message
news:gv9oeu$1cdt$1 digitalmars.com...
 Apropos this StackOverflow item -
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/874052/properties-file-library-for-c-or-c -
is there a major
reason why platformstl::properties_file uses basic_string_view, rather than basic_string? My reasons are given in that post.
 Is it possible to change it so that std::string is the default, and
string_view can be had by specialisation?
May 24 2009