c++.stl - STLsoft installation
- jim p (21/21) Jul 08 2003 When installing STLsoft, do I unzip the files to the existing \dm\stl
- Walter (2/2) Jul 09 2003 Please repost in the c++.stlsoft newsgroup! Matthew can help you there, ...
- Matthew Wilson (4/6) Jul 09 2003 Far, far less regularly/rigorously. It was a bit of coincidence that I d...
- Matthew Wilson (5/26) Jul 09 2003 stlsoft should probably be a peer of stlport. I can't think of any reaso...
When installing STLsoft, do I unzip the files to the existing \dm\stl directory, or do I create \dm\stlsoft and unzip them there ?? Also, should the existing \dm\stl directory be placed in the include path ?? My current directory structure looks like: 07/07/2003 10:05 <DIR> . 07/07/2003 10:05 <DIR> .. 05/07/2003 18:55 <DIR> _template PRJ 05/07/2003 18:55 <DIR> bin 15/12/2002 14:00 <DIR> Command Line Argument Fix 16/09/2002 18:27 <DIR> ctools 08/07/2003 15:48 <DIR> help 02/07/2003 17:46 <DIR> html 04/06/2003 00:34 <DIR> include 02/07/2003 19:53 <DIR> lib 16/09/2002 18:26 <DIR> mfc 16/09/2002 18:25 <DIR> redist16 20/10/2002 21:52 <DIR> redist32 16/09/2002 18:25 <DIR> samples 16/09/2002 18:20 <DIR> src 16/09/2002 18:20 <DIR> stl 08/07/2003 19:22 <DIR> stlport
Jul 08 2003
Please repost in the c++.stlsoft newsgroup! Matthew can help you there, I don't know if he checks this group. Thanks!
Jul 09 2003
Far, far less regularly/rigorously. It was a bit of coincidence that I did so just now. ;) "Walter" <walter digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:behea1$2m6h$1 digitaldaemon.com...Please repost in the c++.stlsoft newsgroup! Matthew can help you there, I don't know if he checks this group. Thanks!
Jul 09 2003
stlsoft should probably be a peer of stlport. I can't think of any reason to install it anywhere else, unless you are using it with multiple compilers (as I do). "jim p" <x y.com> wrote in message news:begbad$1l5s$1 digitaldaemon.com...When installing STLsoft, do I unzip the files to the existing \dm\stl directory, or do I create \dm\stlsoft and unzip them there ?? Also, should the existing \dm\stl directory be placed in the include path??My current directory structure looks like: 07/07/2003 10:05 <DIR> . 07/07/2003 10:05 <DIR> .. 05/07/2003 18:55 <DIR> _template PRJ 05/07/2003 18:55 <DIR> bin 15/12/2002 14:00 <DIR> Command Line Argument Fix 16/09/2002 18:27 <DIR> ctools 08/07/2003 15:48 <DIR> help 02/07/2003 17:46 <DIR> html 04/06/2003 00:34 <DIR> include 02/07/2003 19:53 <DIR> lib 16/09/2002 18:26 <DIR> mfc 16/09/2002 18:25 <DIR> redist16 20/10/2002 21:52 <DIR> redist32 16/09/2002 18:25 <DIR> samples 16/09/2002 18:20 <DIR> src 16/09/2002 18:20 <DIR> stl 08/07/2003 19:22 <DIR> stlport
Jul 09 2003
As matt says, it would be a lot cleaner to just put stlsoft in its own directory: C:\dm\stlsoft or place it in a global include directory (as us linux-addict users are prone to do): C:\include\stlsoft and then add the path to sc.ini in c:\dm\bin\sc.ini "Matthew Wilson" <matthew stlsoft.org> wrote in message news:beid7o$jh2$3 digitaldaemon.com...stlsoft should probably be a peer of stlport. I can't think of any reasontoinstall it anywhere else, unless you are using it with multiple compilers (as I do). "jim p" <x y.com> wrote in message news:begbad$1l5s$1 digitaldaemon.com...pathWhen installing STLsoft, do I unzip the files to the existing \dm\stl directory, or do I create \dm\stlsoft and unzip them there ?? Also, should the existing \dm\stl directory be placed in the include??My current directory structure looks like: 07/07/2003 10:05 <DIR> . 07/07/2003 10:05 <DIR> .. 05/07/2003 18:55 <DIR> _template PRJ 05/07/2003 18:55 <DIR> bin 15/12/2002 14:00 <DIR> Command Line Argument Fix 16/09/2002 18:27 <DIR> ctools 08/07/2003 15:48 <DIR> help 02/07/2003 17:46 <DIR> html 04/06/2003 00:34 <DIR> include 02/07/2003 19:53 <DIR> lib 16/09/2002 18:26 <DIR> mfc 16/09/2002 18:25 <DIR> redist16 20/10/2002 21:52 <DIR> redist32 16/09/2002 18:25 <DIR> samples 16/09/2002 18:20 <DIR> src 16/09/2002 18:20 <DIR> stl 08/07/2003 19:22 <DIR> stlport
Jul 10 2003
Thanks "Greg Peet" <admin gregpeet.com> wrote in message news:bej3il$19lv$1 digitaldaemon.com...As matt says, it would be a lot cleaner to just put stlsoft in its own directory: C:\dm\stlsoft or place it in a global include directory (as us linux-addict users are prone to do): C:\include\stlsoft and then add the path to sc.ini in c:\dm\bin\sc.ini "Matthew Wilson" <matthew stlsoft.org> wrote in message news:beid7o$jh2$3 digitaldaemon.com...reasonstlsoft should probably be a peer of stlport. I can't think of anytocompilersinstall it anywhere else, unless you are using it with multiplenews:begbad$1l5s$1 digitaldaemon.com...(as I do). "jim p" <x y.com> wrote in messagepathWhen installing STLsoft, do I unzip the files to the existing \dm\stl directory, or do I create \dm\stlsoft and unzip them there ?? Also, should the existing \dm\stl directory be placed in the include??My current directory structure looks like: 07/07/2003 10:05 <DIR> . 07/07/2003 10:05 <DIR> .. 05/07/2003 18:55 <DIR> _template PRJ 05/07/2003 18:55 <DIR> bin 15/12/2002 14:00 <DIR> Command Line Argument Fix 16/09/2002 18:27 <DIR> ctools 08/07/2003 15:48 <DIR> help 02/07/2003 17:46 <DIR> html 04/06/2003 00:34 <DIR> include 02/07/2003 19:53 <DIR> lib 16/09/2002 18:26 <DIR> mfc 16/09/2002 18:25 <DIR> redist16 20/10/2002 21:52 <DIR> redist32 16/09/2002 18:25 <DIR> samples 16/09/2002 18:20 <DIR> src 16/09/2002 18:20 <DIR> stl 08/07/2003 19:22 <DIR> stlport
Jul 10 2003