c++.stl - Apache stlcxx
- James Mansion (8/8) Apr 20 2006 Does anyone know if dmc will work with this code (which used to be Rogue...
- Arjan (8/22) Apr 20 2006 Tools.h++ ?
- Jan Knepper (13/27) Apr 20 2006 Tools.h++ indeed used to compile fine DMC++ (and Symantec C++ for that
Does anyone know if dmc will work with this code (which used to be Rogue Wave code)? Its not in the Platforms list, but I wonder if the build infrastructure commited here http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi?rev=349027&view=rev could be adapted. Anyhow, more variety of template tests is better than less. Be nice to know if the compiler could handle ntl and the Ultimate++ (upp) code too. Not least, upp is a pretty nice IDE and toolset. James
Apr 20 2006
James Mansion wrote:Does anyone know if dmc will work with this code (which used to be Rogue Wave code)?Tools.h++ ? I have used it in combination with zApp in various projects with DMC without problems but that is 2-3 years ago. I know the recent releases of the compiler (with the new name lookup) reported some issues with the version of tools.h++ used in those projects. I would just give it try. ArjanIts not in the Platforms list, but I wonder if the build infrastructure commited here http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi?rev=349027&view=rev could be adapted. Anyhow, more variety of template tests is better than less. Be nice to know if the compiler could handle ntl and the Ultimate++ (upp) code too. Not least, upp is a pretty nice IDE and toolset. James
Apr 20 2006
Tools.h++ indeed used to compile fine DMC++ (and Symantec C++ for that matter) they had a focus to be usable with a lot of compilers. I do not recall that I had to do a LOT of patching, not even when I worked for Rogue Wave for 3+ months to release their latest version of zApp. With the newer compiler with stricter type-casting and name-lookup you might have to patch a couple of things as mentioned by Arjan. Jan James Mansion wrote:Does anyone know if dmc will work with this code (which used to be Rogue Wave code)? Its not in the Platforms list, but I wonder if the build infrastructure commited here http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi?rev=349027&view=rev could be adapted. Anyhow, more variety of template tests is better than less. Be nice to know if the compiler could handle ntl and the Ultimate++ (upp) code too. Not least, upp is a pretty nice IDE and toolset. James-- ManiaC++ Jan Knepper But as for me and my household, we shall use Mozilla... www.mozilla.org
Apr 20 2006