c++.chat - MSN protocol filtering msgs by words
- Tom (30/30) Apr 07 2006 Hi everybody. Sorry about the noise but I wish to know about your
- Jan Knepper (11/45) Apr 10 2006 Would not know if this is true, but just for this reason I use Y!, AIM,
- mufuah (15/55) Dec 27 2010 Hi friend! i'm fidelis mufuah saying hi and happy to communicat with
Hi everybody. Sorry about the noise but I wish to know about your opinions on the next. From time to time, I use MSN protocol for communicating because, at least here in Argentina, it's the most popular client for the common of Argentine guys and girls. Not that I consider myself one of them :P, but to be online with the most of my not-nerd friends, I have no choice other than use the protocol. Maybe this isn't new to everybody, but it was for me today as it can be to someone else. Today I've read some mail I receive daily from a mailing list of CS Students of the University where I study (UBA), warning everyone of a not-very-honest behavior of the MS people in what concerns to their client/protocol "MSN Messenger". They do filter messages that contain certain words, apparently from web pages that offers some services which makes competition to them (I guess). I've made the test myself with the word "subitufoto". This is a web page that offers photo upload for free (www.subitufoto.com.ar). When the word "subitufoto" appears in some message it is apparently sent but currently not received by the other peer. I may be naive but this can't be just a bug, can it? We never know what other words are being filtered/recorded/etc but this sucks! This makes me distrust profoundly of MSN from now on (not in the sense of confidentiality which it naturally lacks). I don't know if this is something geographically dependent (i.e. only specific for some countries or languages), but I've certainly tested it and it's the bare and sad true. Does anyone know something on the subject? Regards, -- Tom;
Apr 07 2006
Would not know if this is true, but just for this reason I use Y!, AIM, Google Talk, and IRC... Than Trillian Pro www.trillian.cc as client which as a SECURE option of AIM... Jan Tom wrote:Hi everybody. Sorry about the noise but I wish to know about your opinions on the next. From time to time, I use MSN protocol for communicating because, at least here in Argentina, it's the most popular client for the common of Argentine guys and girls. Not that I consider myself one of them :P, but to be online with the most of my not-nerd friends, I have no choice other than use the protocol. Maybe this isn't new to everybody, but it was for me today as it can be to someone else. Today I've read some mail I receive daily from a mailing list of CS Students of the University where I study (UBA), warning everyone of a not-very-honest behavior of the MS people in what concerns to their client/protocol "MSN Messenger". They do filter messages that contain certain words, apparently from web pages that offers some services which makes competition to them (I guess). I've made the test myself with the word "subitufoto". This is a web page that offers photo upload for free (www.subitufoto.com.ar). When the word "subitufoto" appears in some message it is apparently sent but currently not received by the other peer. I may be naive but this can't be just a bug, can it? We never know what other words are being filtered/recorded/etc but this sucks! This makes me distrust profoundly of MSN from now on (not in the sense of confidentiality which it naturally lacks). I don't know if this is something geographically dependent (i.e. only specific for some countries or languages), but I've certainly tested it and it's the bare and sad true. Does anyone know something on the subject? Regards,-- ManiaC++ Jan Knepper But as for me and my household, we shall use Mozilla... www.mozilla.org
Apr 10 2006
== Quote from Jan Knepper (jan smartsoft.us)'s articleWould not know if this is true, but just for this reason I use Y!, AIM, Google Talk, and IRC... Than Trillian Pro www.trillian.cc as client which as a SECURE option of AIM... Jan Tom wrote:Hi friend! i'm fidelis mufuah saying hi and happy to communicat with people i had never seen.If God permit we shall live and long path as friends.I had register on google search for the research of my notes and articles and this is where i came over your interesting article. If you will never mine,let chart with each other and explore the world of our own.the globe is only big on the map but can be explore within the shortest period of time as you meet friends. my contact is Fidelis mufuah pang university of yaounde I Cameroon Faculty of Sciences, Dept of Biochemistry Level 4, tel;+23779415072 Thanks for meeting you hoping you will my good friend.Happy new year 2011 Until we meet, stay bless and be God fearingHi everybody. Sorry about the noise but I wish to know about your opinions on the next. From time to time, I use MSN protocol for communicating because, at least here in Argentina, it's the most popular client for the common of Argentine guys and girls. Not that I consider myself one of them :P, but to be online with the most of my not-nerd friends, I have no choice other than use the protocol. Maybe this isn't new to everybody, but it was for me today as it can be to someone else. Today I've read some mail I receive daily from a mailing list of CS Students of the University where I study (UBA), warning everyone of a not-very-honest behavior of the MS people in what concerns to their client/protocol "MSN Messenger". They do filter messages that contain certain words, apparently from web pages that offers some services which makes competition to them (I guess). I've made the test myself with the word "subitufoto". This is a web page that offers photo upload for free (www.subitufoto.com.ar). When the word "subitufoto" appears in some message it is apparently sent but currently not received by the other peer. I may be naive but this can't be just a bug, can it? We never know what other words are being filtered/recorded/etc but this sucks! This makes me distrust profoundly of MSN from now on (not in the sense of confidentiality which it naturally lacks). I don't know if this is something geographically dependent (i.e. only specific for some countries or languages), but I've certainly tested it and it's the bare and sad true. Does anyone know something on the subject? Regards,
Dec 27 2010