c++ - Destructor called without constructor in static function (old WDJ bug).
charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Source: #include <iostream.h> class foo {public: static bar() { cout << "bar ";} foo() {cout << = "ctor ";} ~foo() {cout << "dtor\n";}}; void main(){ foo().bar();} Output bar dtor Destructor was called without calling the constructor. This was reported = in Windows Development Journal with comments by Ron Burk years ago and now I think only DMC++ still has this bug. GNU saying "bar" - perhaps the optimisation is too wonderful to be = true... VC++ and BCC32 says "ctor bar dtor" which object was created and = destroyed.=20
 Aug 06 2002
charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Does Ron have a web page for this (i.e. are there other tests of = interest?)? "KarL" <someone somewhere.org> wrote in message = news:aiq9u1$m0r$1 digitaldaemon.com... Source: #include <iostream.h> class foo {public: static bar() { cout << "bar ";} foo() {cout << = "ctor ";} ~foo() {cout << "dtor\n";}}; void main(){ foo().bar();} Output bar dtor Destructor was called without calling the constructor. This was = reported in Windows Development Journal with comments by Ron Burk years ago and now I think only DMC++ still has this bug. GNU saying "bar" - perhaps the optimisation is too wonderful to be = true... VC++ and BCC32 says "ctor bar dtor" which object was created and = destroyed.=20
 Aug 07 2002
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Unfortunately Ron has left WDJ and WDJ is now called wd-mag and I =
stopped
my subscriptions because the journal is bad now.
The file date of the source sayd 4th December 1995 so the bug is really =
really old.
I'll try to dig the article out from my boxes from home and forward it =
you.
Cheers...
  Walter <walter digitalmars.com> wrote in message =
news:aise6g$24el$2 digitaldaemon.com...
  Does Ron have a web page for this (i.e. are there other tests of =
interest?)?
    "KarL" <someone somewhere.org> wrote in message =
news:aiq9u1$m0r$1 digitaldaemon.com...
    Source:
#include <iostream.h>
class foo {public:  static bar() { cout << "bar ";}  foo() {cout << =
"ctor ";}  ~foo() {cout << "dtor\n";}};
void main(){  foo().bar();}
    Output
bar dtor
    Destructor was called without calling the constructor. This was =
reported in
    Windows Development Journal with comments by Ron Burk years ago and
    now I think only DMC++ still has this bug.
    =20
    GNU saying "bar" - perhaps the optimisation is too wonderful to be =
true...
    VC++ and BCC32 says "ctor bar dtor" which object was created and =
destroyed.=20
 Aug 07 2002








 
  
  
  "KarL" <someone somewhere.org>
 "KarL" <someone somewhere.org>