D.gnu - [performance]Win32.dmd against cygwin.dmd
- Manfred Nowak (9/9) Jan 24 2005 Looks nice :-)
- Mark T (4/13) Jan 29 2005 I'm confused is this DMD-Win32 (Digital Mars compiler) versus GDC using ...
- Manfred Nowak (11/15) Jan 30 2005 Yes. The programs were compiled unmodified with Digital Mars compiler
Looks nice :-) results Program Win32 cygin unit factor t.ackermann(4,1) 29.547 13.985 s 2.11 dhrystone 3.079956 5.882353 DMIPS 1.91 whetstone.single 1048.670 1339.764 MWIPS 1.28 whetstone.double 1001.124 1284.687 MWIPS 1.28 whetstone.real 716.854 881.343 MWIPS 1.23 -manfred
Jan 24 2005
In article <ct3hp2$1upg$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Manfred Nowak says...Looks nice :-) results Program Win32 cygin unit factor t.ackermann(4,1) 29.547 13.985 s 2.11 dhrystone 3.079956 5.882353 DMIPS 1.91 whetstone.single 1048.670 1339.764 MWIPS 1.28 whetstone.double 1001.124 1284.687 MWIPS 1.28 whetstone.real 716.854 881.343 MWIPS 1.23 -manfredI'm confused is this DMD-Win32 (Digital Mars compiler) versus GDC using Cygwin on Windows? Did you optimize the DMD stuff?
Jan 29 2005
Mark T wrote:I'm confused is this DMD-Win32 (Digital Mars compiler) versus GDC using Cygwin on Windows? Did you optimize the DMD stuff?Yes. The programs were compiled unmodified with Digital Mars compiler dmd.0.111.win32 and gdc-GCC3.4.4 20050121-prerelease.cygwin both compiles and resulting executabls ran under WinXP.PRO.servicepack2. The dmd.win32-compile and the gdc.cygwin.win32.compile using the dmd script used the flags "-O -release -inline". The programs compiled are the ackermann program from D-Stress benchmarks, the dhrystone program from the examples coming with dmd and my adaption of the whetstone benchamrk to D, for which I do not know, whether I am allowed to publish it. -manfred
Jan 30 2005