• cblack01 (17/17) May 28 2002 Hey,
• anderson (6/9) May 31 2002 never
• cblack01 (10/17) Jun 01 2002 C# does NOT compile down to binary code. It uses a JIT and it is very s...

"cblack01" <cblack01 cox.net> writes:

Hey,


reflection?


parameters using the params keyword like this:

void Print(params string stuffToPrint[])
{
    foreach(oneThing in stuffToPrint) System.Console.WriteLn(oneThing);
}

Then you would call it like this:

Print("Printing ", "variable ", "parameters");


use it since I do a lot of scientific applications that are too



Thanks,

Craig

"anderson" <anderson firestar.com.au> writes:

"cblack01" <cblack01 cox.net> wrote in message
news:ad0t37$a9c$1 digitaldaemon.com...



never
 use it since I do a lot of scientific applications that are too
 computationally intensive for an interpreted language.


but many versions can also compile code with the same or better efficiency
then C++.

"cblack01" <cblack01 cox.net> writes:

 never
 use it since I do a lot of scientific applications that are too
 computationally intensive for an interpreted language.


 but many versions can also compile code with the same or better efficiency
 then C++.


I know. I've done the benchmarking myself.  I tested it to be about 5 times
slower than native C++ with simple object-oriented test programs.  I suspect

comparably well is with non-object-oriented simple monolithic programs, like


This is just not true.  Word to your momma.


not in the near future.