D - DMD 0.82 is even more buggy than 0.81
- imr1984 (4/4) Apr 01 2004 i get the following message when compiling my project with 0.82:
-
Manfred Nowak
(3/5)
Apr 01 2004
if you can compile it, then there is a way to stop that. - imr1984 (2/7) Apr 01 2004
-
Stewart Gordon
(8/9)
Apr 01 2004
- J Anderson (7/9) Apr 01 2004 This is probably obvious but when debugging dig (with such errors) I ran...
- Walter (4/12) Apr 01 2004 before :(
- Walter (5/9) Apr 01 2004 that
- J C Calvarese (14/20) Apr 01 2004 I've tried tracking down errors in big projects and I know it can be
i get the following message when compiling my project with 0.82: Internal error: ..\ztc\cod1.c 2651 and it compiled fine with DMD 0.81. Unfortunately my project is so big that there is not way i could track down the piece of code thats causing this.
Apr 01 2004
imr1984 wrote:my project is so big that there is not way i could track down the piece of code thats causing this.<g> if you can compile it, then there is a way to stop that. So long!
Apr 01 2004
the thing is i cant compile it now. DMD throws up on me where it didnt before :( In article <c4hfuu$cvc$1 digitaldaemon.com>, Manfred Nowak says...imr1984 wrote:my project is so big that there is not way i could track down the piece of code thats causing this.<g> if you can compile it, then there is a way to stop that. So long!
Apr 01 2004
imr1984 wrote:the thing is i cant compile it now. DMD throws up on me where it didnt before :(<snip> Oh well, maybe someone'll manage to isolate the problem someday.... Stewart. -- My e-mail is valid but not my primary mailbox, aside from its being the unfortunate victim of intensive mail-bombing at the moment. Please keep replies on the 'group where everyone may benefit.
Apr 01 2004
imr1984 wrote:the thing is i cant compile it now. DMD throws up on me where it didnt before :(This is probably obvious but when debugging dig (with such errors) I ran the complier in verbose mode to isolate the particular module. Then commented out code (large at first in a kinda binary search fashion) until I worked down to the problem area. -- -Anderson: http://badmama.com.au/~anderson/
Apr 01 2004
"J Anderson" <REMOVEanderson badmama.com.au> wrote in message news:c4ho0k$pbk$2 digitaldaemon.com...imr1984 wrote:before :(the thing is i cant compile it now. DMD throws up on me where it didntYup, that's how it's done.This is probably obvious but when debugging dig (with such errors) I ran the complier in verbose mode to isolate the particular module. Then commented out code (large at first in a kinda binary search fashion) until I worked down to the problem area.
Apr 01 2004
"imr1984" <imr1984_member pathlink.com> wrote in message news:c4h2vh$2qtl$1 digitaldaemon.com...i get the following message when compiling my project with 0.82: Internal error: ..\ztc\cod1.c 2651 and it compiled fine with DMD 0.81. Unfortunately my project is so bigthatthere is not way i could track down the piece of code thats causing this.Sure there is. Copy your project to another directory, then just start deleting code, function by function.
Apr 01 2004
imr1984 wrote:i get the following message when compiling my project with 0.82: Internal error: ..\ztc\cod1.c 2651 and it compiled fine with DMD 0.81. Unfortunately my project is so big that there is not way i could track down the piece of code thats causing this.I've tried tracking down errors in big projects and I know it can be frustrating. If it's a multiple-file project, you could try compiling files separately. Instead of: dmd file1.d file2.d Try this: dmd file1.d -c dmd file2.d -c If the error shows up for one of the separate files, then that narrows it down. -- Justin http://jcc_7.tripod.com/d/
Apr 01 2004