• =?iso-8859-15?Q?=22Robert_M._M=FCnch=22?= (11/11) Sep 18 2003 Hi, seems I'm not complete uptodate (even I follow this group :-|) and
• Alen Siljak (6/12) Sep 19 2003 Digc still seems to be usable. Dig, too. Burton seems to be on a

=?iso-8859-15?Q?=22Robert_M._M=FCnch=22?= <robert.muench robertmuench.de> writes:

Hi, seems I'm not complete uptodate (even I follow this group :-|) and 
somehow lost track of the state.

What's the state of DIG and DIGC? IIRC Burton somehow vanished from this 
group and the project isn't supported at the moment, right? What does this 
mean for us? Is DIGC still useable with newer DMD compilers? Does using 
DIGC still make sense? Is DIG in a state that it's worth being considered 
as a base for a project? Questions over questions...

-- 
Robert M. Münch
Management & IT Freelancer
http://www.robertmuench.de

Alen Siljak <alen djesi.ba_nospam> writes:

Robert M. Münch wrote:

 What's the state of DIG and DIGC? IIRC Burton somehow vanished from this 
 group and the project isn't supported at the moment, right? What does 
 this mean for us? Is DIGC still useable with newer DMD compilers? Does 
 using DIGC still make sense? Is DIG in a state that it's worth being 
 considered as a base for a project? Questions over questions...
 

Digc still seems to be usable. Dig, too. Burton seems to be on a 
vacation and wxD in pre-development.
A lot of "seeming" around. :)

Metta,

Alen