digitalmars.D - [your code here]
- Joshua Niehus (15/15) Feb 17 2012 Not as fancy as the other submits, but it might be worthy of the
- Jose Armando Garcia (5/19) Feb 17 2012 Looks like Haskell to me. Granted that Haskell has syntactic sugar for
- Andrei Alexandrescu (4/19) Feb 17 2012 Thanks. I have received a proposal in my inbox for rotating examples.
- Denis Shelomovskij (36/51) Feb 18 2012 Some remarks:
- Joshua Niehus (3/28) Feb 18 2012 Ahhh, thats much cleaner, thanks.
Not as fancy as the other submits, but it might be worthy of the
front page:
import std.stdio, std.traits;
void main(string[] args) {
auto foo(T)(T n) {
return delegate(T i) {
static if (isSomeString!(T))
auto m = mixin("n ~ i");
else
auto m = mixin("n + i");
return m;
};
}
writeln(foo("Hello")(" World!"));
writeln(foo(18)(24)); }
Feb 17 2012
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Joshua Niehus <jm.niehus gmail.com> wrote:Not as fancy as the other submits, but it might be worthy of the front pa=ge:import std.stdio, std.traits; void main(string[] args) { =A0 =A0auto foo(T)(T n) { =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0return delegate(T i) { =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0static if (isSomeString!(T)) =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0auto m =3D mixin("n ~ i"); =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0else =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0auto m =3D mixin("n + i"); =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0return m; =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0}; =A0 =A0} =A0 =A0writeln(foo("Hello")(" World!")); =A0 =A0writeln(foo(18)(24)); =A0 }Looks like Haskell to me. Granted that Haskell has syntactic sugar for this that makes it more readable. -Jose
Feb 17 2012
On 2/17/12 2:33 PM, Joshua Niehus wrote:
Not as fancy as the other submits, but it might be worthy of the front
page:
import std.stdio, std.traits;
void main(string[] args) {
auto foo(T)(T n) {
return delegate(T i) {
static if (isSomeString!(T))
auto m = mixin("n ~ i");
else
auto m = mixin("n + i");
return m;
};
}
writeln(foo("Hello")(" World!"));
writeln(foo(18)(24)); }
Thanks. I have received a proposal in my inbox for rotating examples.
Stay tuned.
Andrei
Feb 17 2012
18.02.2012 0:33, Joshua Niehus пишет:
Not as fancy as the other submits, but it might be worthy of the front
page:
import std.stdio, std.traits;
void main(string[] args) {
auto foo(T)(T n) {
return delegate(T i) {
static if (isSomeString!(T))
auto m = mixin("n ~ i");
else
auto m = mixin("n + i");
return m;
};
}
writeln(foo("Hello")(" World!"));
writeln(foo(18)(24)); }
Some remarks:
0. `string[] args` isn't needed;
1. `delegate` is not needed;
2. `isSomeString!(T)` can be replaced by `isSomeString!T`;
3. `static if` can be replaced by `auto m = mixin(isSomeString!T ? "n ~
i" : "n + i");`;
4. With nnew `=>` syntax function body can be replaced by
`return (T i) => mixin(isSomeString!T ? "n ~ i" : "n + i");`
or
`return (T i) => mixin("n" ~ (isSomeString!T ? '~' : '+') ~ 'i');`
So your code can looks like this:
---
import std.stdio, std.traits;
void main() {
auto foo(T)(T n) {
return (T i) => mixin("n" ~ (isSomeString!T ? '~' : '+') ~ 'i');
}
writeln(foo("Hello")(" World!"));
writeln(foo(18)(24));
}
---
or even like this:
---
import std.stdio, std.traits;
void bar(alias foo)() {
writeln(foo("Hello")(" World!"));
writeln(foo(18)(24));
}
void main() {
bar!(n => (typeof(n) i) => mixin("n" ~ (isSomeString!(typeof(n)) ?
'~' : '+') ~ 'i'))();
}
---
IMHO, all these three versions should be on the site grouped somehow
(i.e. one can navigate between analogous).
Feb 18 2012
On Saturday, 18 February 2012 at 08:18:32 UTC, Denis Shelomovskij
wrote:
Some remarks:
0. `string[] args` isn't needed;
1. `delegate` is not needed;
2. `isSomeString!(T)` can be replaced by `isSomeString!T`;
3. `static if` can be replaced by `auto m =
mixin(isSomeString!T ? "n ~ i" : "n + i");`;
4. With nnew `=>` syntax function body can be replaced by
`return (T i) => mixin(isSomeString!T ? "n ~ i" : "n + i");`
or
`return (T i) => mixin("n" ~ (isSomeString!T ? '~' : '+') ~
'i');`
So your code can looks like this:
---
import std.stdio, std.traits;
void main() {
auto foo(T)(T n) {
return (T i) => mixin("n" ~ (isSomeString!T ? '~' :
'+') ~ 'i');
}
writeln(foo("Hello")(" World!"));
writeln(foo(18)(24));
}
IMHO, all these three versions should be on the site grouped
somehow (i.e. one can navigate between analogous).
Ahhh, thats much cleaner, thanks.
Feb 18 2012









Jose Armando Garcia <jsancio gmail.com> 