digitalmars.D - what is/could be D's killer app/features?
- Jack (2/2) Jun 03 2022 something like you would show to your co-workers to sell D to
- Ola Fosheim =?UTF-8?B?R3LDuHN0YWQ=?= (4/4) Jun 04 2022 D's killer feature should be simple looking source code.
- mee6 (6/11) Jun 04 2022 If D syntax alone was a "killer feature", it would sell itself
- Ola Fosheim =?UTF-8?B?R3LDuHN0YWQ=?= (10/14) Jun 04 2022 There are many languages that are close to D syntactically
- forkit (9/11) Jun 04 2022 A .NET like framework.
- Adam D Ruppe (3/4) Jun 04 2022 with the arsd libraries D does everything extremely well it is
- Guillaume Piolat (5/7) Jun 04 2022 D is really quite a neutral language, it adapts quite a bit to
- Guillaume Piolat (2/3) Jun 04 2022 Software that have good UX feels like that.
- monkyyy (2/4) Jun 04 2022 nested varatic templates that use some bug
something like you would show to your co-workers to sell D to them?
Jun 03 2022
D's killer feature should be simple looking source code. That is the easiest path to staying relevant in comparison to C++ and Rust. Unfortunately this perspective seems to have been lost completely.
Jun 04 2022
On Saturday, 4 June 2022 at 09:13:22 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote:D's killer feature should be simple looking source code. That is the easiest path to staying relevant in comparison to C++ and Rust. Unfortunately this perspective seems to have been lost completely.If D syntax alone was a "killer feature", it would sell itself and would just be more popular than it is. Unfortunately D syntax would only appeal to people that use C++ but still people just use C++ instead.
Jun 04 2022
On Saturday, 4 June 2022 at 17:06:39 UTC, mee6 wrote:If D syntax alone was a "killer feature", it would sell itself and would just be more popular than it is. Unfortunately D syntax would only appeal to people that use C++ but still people just use C++ instead.There are many languages that are close to D syntactically Unfortunately, there are other bits missing atm that is a likely turn-off for C++-minded people (like a marketable memory management solution), but those are fortunately being worked on, or at least discussed with an open mindset. I think many C++ programmers would want a higher level clean looking language with a comparable memory management story. D is fairly close, but the last mile is missing.
Jun 04 2022
On Saturday, 4 June 2022 at 06:26:41 UTC, Jack wrote:something like you would show to your co-workers to sell D to them?A .NET like framework. A .NET like tooling and support ecosystem. The language itself, is the least interesting (but still important) component ;-) If I gave D to may co-workers, they say: "How the f$!^ I am meant to build this solution in D. For christ sake! Go away!". But for a simple console program, that might be interested in D.
Jun 04 2022
On Saturday, 4 June 2022 at 11:25:55 UTC, forkit wrote:But for a simple console program, that might be interested in D.with the arsd libraries D does everything extremely well it is pleasant af
Jun 04 2022
On Saturday, 4 June 2022 at 06:26:41 UTC, Jack wrote:something like you would show to your co-workers to sell D to them?D is really quite a neutral language, it adapts quite a bit to you with a pliable personnality. You can do things in your own way, and it feels like "programming", not "programming in language X".
Jun 04 2022
On Saturday, 4 June 2022 at 12:54:15 UTC, Guillaume Piolat wrote:You can do things in your own waySoftware that have good UX feels like that.
Jun 04 2022
On Saturday, 4 June 2022 at 06:26:41 UTC, Jack wrote:something like you would show to your co-workers to sell D to them?nested varatic templates that use some bug
Jun 04 2022