digitalmars.D - std.uuid vote results

digitalmars.D - std.uuid vote results - accepted!

Dmitry Olshansky (19/19) Jun 26 2012 The voting is over, and, not surprising, std.uuid is accepted for

Jens Mueller (12/32) Jun 26 2012 I think the most up to date list is here

Dmitry Olshansky (13/44) Jun 26 2012 Great, I'd love to see it in Phobos.

=?ISO-8859-15?Q?Alex_R=F8nne_Petersen?= (6/50) Jun 26 2012 For starters, we could put a link to the Trello org on dlang.org.

Bernard Helyer (1/1) Jun 27 2012 Congrats!
Johannes Pfau (11/32) Jul 01 2012 Thanks!

Dmitry Olshansky <dmitry.olsh gmail.com> writes:

The voting is over, and, not surprising, std.uuid is accepted for 
inclusion into Phobos with 10 "yes" vs 0 "no" votes total.

Congratulations, Johannes! Time to roll up pull request ;)

Votes counted as YES:
	1. Alex R�nne Petersen
	2. John Chapman
	3. Jesse Phillips
	4. Jonathan M Davis
	5. Jonas Drewsen
	6. Mike Wey
	7. Me
	8. Masahiro Nakagawa
	9. David Nadlinger (on condition of fixing  trusted)
	10. Bernard Helyer

P.S. I'm glad we did it. Any new candidates?
Let's keep reviews going, as I recall there were some crowding in review 
queue already.

-- 
Dmitry Olshansky

Jun 26 2012

Jens Mueller <jens.k.mueller gmx.de> writes:

Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
 The voting is over, and, not surprising, std.uuid is accepted for
 inclusion into Phobos with 10 "yes" vs 0 "no" votes total.
=20
 Congratulations, Johannes! Time to roll up pull request ;)
=20
 Votes counted as YES:
 	1. Alex R=F8nne Petersen
 	2. John Chapman
 	3. Jesse Phillips
 	4. Jonathan M Davis
 	5. Jonas Drewsen
 	6. Mike Wey
 	7. Me
 	8. Masahiro Nakagawa
 	9. David Nadlinger (on condition of fixing  trusted)
 	10. Bernard Helyer
=20
 P.S. I'm glad we did it. Any new candidates?
 Let's keep reviews going, as I recall there were some crowding in
 review queue already.

I think the most up to date list is here
http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?ReviewQueue
Andrei is preparing std.benchmark for review. I do not know about other
candidates.

BTW there is also
https://trello.com/board/phobos-review-queue/4f33d3c6542c156960533efb

It should be decided what is the official source regarding reviews. It
seemed as if it would be moved over to Trello in the hope for a better
organization. If there is a consensus I will move all information from
the Wiki to Trello.

Jens

Jun 26 2012

Dmitry Olshansky <dmitry.olsh gmail.com> writes:

On 27-Jun-12 01:00, Jens Mueller wrote:
 Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
 The voting is over, and, not surprising, std.uuid is accepted for
 inclusion into Phobos with 10 "yes" vs 0 "no" votes total.

 Congratulations, Johannes! Time to roll up pull request ;)

 Votes counted as YES:
 	1. Alex R�nne Petersen
 	2. John Chapman
 	3. Jesse Phillips
 	4. Jonathan M Davis
 	5. Jonas Drewsen
 	6. Mike Wey
 	7. Me
 	8. Masahiro Nakagawa
 	9. David Nadlinger (on condition of fixing  trusted)
 	10. Bernard Helyer

 P.S. I'm glad we did it. Any new candidates?
 Let's keep reviews going, as I recall there were some crowding in
 review queue already.

 I think the most up to date list is here
 http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?ReviewQueue
 Andrei is preparing std.benchmark for review. I do not know about other
 candidates.

Great, I'd love to see it in Phobos.

However I believe it's important to have alternatives. Review requires 
certain amount of spare time from BOTH reviewers and the author. It not 
at all unexpected for author to suddenly not have enough of spare time 
for current review cycle.

 BTW there is also
 https://trello.com/board/phobos-review-queue/4f33d3c6542c156960533efb

 It should be decided what is the official source regarding reviews. It
 seemed as if it would be moved over to Trello in the hope for a better
 organization. If there is a consensus I will move all information from
 the Wiki to Trello.

The trello has the disadvantage of being even less 
public/popular/obvious then D wiki. D wiki has the only disadvantage of 
it having a big pile of junk coming from the old D1 days.

I don't think Trello is a net improvement at all but I may be missing 
something.


-- 
Dmitry Olshansky

Jun 26 2012

=?ISO-8859-15?Q?Alex_R=F8nne_Petersen?= <alex lycus.org> writes:

On 26-06-2012 23:16, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
 On 27-Jun-12 01:00, Jens Mueller wrote:
 Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
 The voting is over, and, not surprising, std.uuid is accepted for
 inclusion into Phobos with 10 "yes" vs 0 "no" votes total.

 Congratulations, Johannes! Time to roll up pull request ;)

 Votes counted as YES:
     1. Alex R�nne Petersen
     2. John Chapman
     3. Jesse Phillips
     4. Jonathan M Davis
     5. Jonas Drewsen
     6. Mike Wey
     7. Me
     8. Masahiro Nakagawa
     9. David Nadlinger (on condition of fixing  trusted)
     10. Bernard Helyer

 P.S. I'm glad we did it. Any new candidates?
 Let's keep reviews going, as I recall there were some crowding in
 review queue already.

 I think the most up to date list is here
 http://prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?ReviewQueue
 Andrei is preparing std.benchmark for review. I do not know about other
 candidates.

 Great, I'd love to see it in Phobos.

 However I believe it's important to have alternatives. Review requires
 certain amount of spare time from BOTH reviewers and the author. It not
 at all unexpected for author to suddenly not have enough of spare time
 for current review cycle.

 BTW there is also
 https://trello.com/board/phobos-review-queue/4f33d3c6542c156960533efb

 It should be decided what is the official source regarding reviews. It
 seemed as if it would be moved over to Trello in the hope for a better
 organization. If there is a consensus I will move all information from
 the Wiki to Trello.

 The trello has the disadvantage of being even less
 public/popular/obvious then D wiki. D wiki has the only disadvantage of
 it having a big pile of junk coming from the old D1 days.

 I don't think Trello is a net improvement at all but I may be missing
 something.

For starters, we could put a link to the Trello org on dlang.org.

-- 
Alex R�nne Petersen
alex lycus.org
http://lycus.org

Jun 26 2012

"Bernard Helyer" <b.helyer gmail.com> writes:

Congrats!

Jun 27 2012

Johannes Pfau <nospam example.com> writes:

Am Tue, 26 Jun 2012 23:42:22 +0400
schrieb Dmitry Olshansky <dmitry.olsh gmail.com>:

 The voting is over, and, not surprising, std.uuid is accepted for=20
 inclusion into Phobos with 10 "yes" vs 0 "no" votes total.
=20
 Congratulations, Johannes! Time to roll up pull request ;)
=20
 Votes counted as YES:
 	1. Alex R=C3=B8nne Petersen
 	2. John Chapman
 	3. Jesse Phillips
 	4. Jonathan M Davis
 	5. Jonas Drewsen
 	6. Mike Wey
 	7. Me
 	8. Masahiro Nakagawa
 	9. David Nadlinger (on condition of fixing  trusted)
 	10. Bernard Helyer
=20
 P.S. I'm glad we did it. Any new candidates?
 Let's keep reviews going, as I recall there were some crowding in
 review queue already.
=20

Thanks!
The pull request(s) are here:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/651
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/d-programming-language.org/pull/1=
33

Took a little longer as I had to fix some small 64bit errors and
annoying problems with the windows makefile (adding std.uuid to the
existing SRC_STD_x or SRC_STD_REST caused out of memory errors for the
autotester. I had to add a new SRC_STD_4 to make it work)

Jul 01 2012

D Programming

C/C++ Programming

Other

digitalmars.D - std.uuid vote results - accepted!