• =?iso-8859-1?Q?Robert_M._M=FCnch?= (6/6) Aug 03 2018 Has anyone already experimented with the jemalloc [1] allocator and D?
• Per =?UTF-8?B?Tm9yZGzDtnc=?= (3/6) Aug 03 2018 You should also check out recent progress in glibc's default
• Per =?UTF-8?B?Tm9yZGzDtnc=?= (4/7) Aug 03 2018 Here are some value insights on the matter:

=?iso-8859-1?Q?Robert_M._M=FCnch?= <robert.muench saphirion.com> writes:

Has anyone already experimented with the jemalloc [1] allocator and D?

[1] http://jemalloc.net/

-- 
Robert M. Münch
http://www.saphirion.com
smarter | better | faster

Per =?UTF-8?B?Tm9yZGzDtnc=?= <per.nordlow gmail.com> writes:

On Friday, 3 August 2018 at 15:23:59 UTC, Robert M. Münch wrote:
 Has anyone already experimented with the jemalloc [1] allocator 
 and D?

 [1] http://jemalloc.net/

You should also check out recent progress in glibc's default 
allocator.

Per =?UTF-8?B?Tm9yZGzDtnc=?= <per.nordlow gmail.com> writes:

On Friday, 3 August 2018 at 15:23:59 UTC, Robert M. Münch wrote:
 Has anyone already experimented with the jemalloc [1] allocator 
 and D?

 [1] http://jemalloc.net/

Here are some value insights on the matter:

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/13027475/cpu-and-memory-usage-of-jemalloc-as-compared-to-glibc-malloc

As always...it all depends...