• Andrei Alexandrescu (9/9) Jun 17 2010 It was rightly suggested that std.bind either gets some love or gets
• Lars T. Kyllingstad (3/6) Jun 18 2010 I'm all for yanking it.

Andrei Alexandrescu <SeeWebsiteForEmail erdani.org> writes:

It was rightly suggested that std.bind either gets some love or gets 
removed from Phobos. Walter convinced me that delegates are a flexible 
alternative to std.bind's arcane notation.

One possible line of work would be to extend std.functional.curry, which 
is a bit limited right now.

At any rate, I'm considering deprecating std.bind. Its design and code 
look dated by today's standards (we've been a long way!) and hardly 
anyone seems to be using it. Should we deprecate it?


Andrei

"Lars T. Kyllingstad" <public kyllingen.NOSPAMnet> writes:

On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 21:51:59 -0700, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:

 At any rate, I'm considering deprecating std.bind. Its design and code
 look dated by today's standards (we've been a long way!) and hardly
 anyone seems to be using it. Should we deprecate it?

I'm all for yanking it.

-Lars