digitalmars.D - rvalues->ref args
- Manu via Digitalmars-d (8/8) Sep 08 2014 Please can we move on a solution to this problem?
Please can we move on a solution to this problem? It's driving me insane. I can't take any more of this! >_< Walter invented a solution that was very popular at dconf2013. I don't recall any problems emerging in post-NG-discussions. Ideally, we would move forward on a design for 'scope', like the promising (imo) proposal that appeared recently. That would solve this problem, and also many other existing safety problems, and even influence solutions relating to other critical GC/performance problems.
Sep 08 2014
"Dicebot" <public dicebot.lv> On Monday, 8 September 2014 at 12:46:36 UTC, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:Please can we move on a solution to this problem? It's driving me insane. I can't take any more of this! >_< Walter invented a solution that was very popular at dconf2013. I don't recall any problems emerging in post-NG-discussions. Ideally, we would move forward on a design for 'scope', like the promising (imo) proposal that appeared recently. That would solve this problem, and also many other existing safety problems, and even influence solutions relating to other critical GC/performance problems.No one had needed that strong enough to actually implement any of approved solutions AFAIK.
Sep 08 2014
On Monday, 8 September 2014 at 12:46:36 UTC, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:Please can we move on a solution to this problem? It's driving me insane. I can't take any more of this! >_< Walter invented a solution that was very popular at dconf2013. I don't recall any problems emerging in post-NG-discussions. Ideally, we would move forward on a design for 'scope', like the promising (imo) proposal that appeared recently. That would solve this problem, and also many other existing safety problems, and even influence solutions relating to other critical GC/performance problems.http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP36 :P
Sep 10 2014