digitalmars.D - proposition classname.this
- Zarathustra (18/18) Nov 27 2008 Proposition: className.this for nested classes
- BCS (2/21) Nov 27 2008 I think that "outer" has been proposed for that as well.
- Jarrett Billingsley (3/21) Nov 27 2008 You can already access that through this.outer.
Proposition: className.this for nested classes
for ex:
class Foo{
void fnc1(){}
class Bar{
void fnc1
void fnc2(){ Foo.this.fnc1; }
}
}
instead of:
class Foo{
Foo Foo_this(){ return this; }
void fnc1(){}
class Bar{
void fnc1
void fnc2(){ Foo_this.fnc1; }
}
}
Nov 27 2008
Reply to Zarathustra,
Proposition: className.this for nested classes
for ex:
class Foo{
void fnc1(){}
class Bar{
void fnc1
void fnc2(){ Foo.this.fnc1; }
}
}
instead of:
class Foo{
Foo Foo_this(){ return this; }
void fnc1(){}
class Bar{
void fnc1
void fnc2(){ Foo_this.fnc1; }
}
}
I think that "outer" has been proposed for that as well.
Nov 27 2008
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 12:39 PM, Zarathustra
<adam.chrapkowski gmail.com> wrote:
Proposition: className.this for nested classes
for ex:
class Foo{
void fnc1(){}
class Bar{
void fnc1
void fnc2(){ Foo.this.fnc1; }
}
}
instead of:
class Foo{
Foo Foo_this(){ return this; }
void fnc1(){}
class Bar{
void fnc1
void fnc2(){ Foo_this.fnc1; }
}
}
You can already access that through this.outer.
Nov 27 2008









BCS <ao pathlink.com> 