• monkyyy (7/7) Dec 08 I shipped some data structure code over on openD, but not all
• Salih Dincer (5/12) Dec 10 I can not follow openD because D gives me a lot of confidence.
• Anton Pastukhov (4/12) Dec 11 Yeah looks kinda weird to advertise openD work on the upstream
• monkyyy (4/6) Dec 11 c++ lacks any taste in api, its opinion should be held in
• evilrat (2/9) Dec 12 those poor mathematicians, they've been brainwashed by c++ folks
• Timon Gehr (8/17) Dec 14 Pretty much. A `vector` ordinarily refers to an element of a vector

monkyyy <crazymonkyyy gmail.com> writes:

I shipped some data structure code over on openD, but not all 
template wizards may be keeping track of the fork.

https://github.com/opendlang/d/blob/main/source/odc/datastructures.d

I think this is the type of thing that benefits from lots of 
iteration, needs some battle testing, needs editing passes by 
other poeple, etc.

criticize

Salih Dincer <salihdb hotmail.com> writes:

On Monday, 9 December 2024 at 02:03:57 UTC, monkyyy wrote:
 I shipped some data structure code over on openD, but not all 
 template wizards may be keeping track of the fork.

 https://github.com/opendlang/d/blob/main/source/odc/datastructures.d

 I think this is the type of thing that benefits from lots of 
 iteration, needs some battle testing, needs editing passes by 
 other poeple, etc.

 criticize

I can not follow openD because D gives me a lot of confidence. 
Since it has not yet been able to prove its age, I am excluding  
it from the evaluation.

SDB 79

Anton Pastukhov <caffeine9999 mailbox.org> writes:

On Monday, 9 December 2024 at 02:03:57 UTC, monkyyy wrote:
 I shipped some data structure code over on openD, but not all 
 template wizards may be keeping track of the fork.

 https://github.com/opendlang/d/blob/main/source/odc/datastructures.d

 I think this is the type of thing that benefits from lots of 
 iteration, needs some battle testing, needs editing passes by 
 other poeple, etc.

 criticize

Yeah looks kinda weird to advertise openD work on the upstream 
website

array2d, array3d

Isn't there a consensus that it's called Vector?

monkyyy <crazymonkyyy gmail.com> writes:

On Wednesday, 11 December 2024 at 08:25:14 UTC, Anton Pastukhov 
wrote:
array2d, array3d

 Isn't there a consensus that it's called Vector?

c++ lacks any taste in api, its opinion should be held in 
negative value

evilrat <evilrat666 gmail.com> writes:

On Wednesday, 11 December 2024 at 15:39:35 UTC, monkyyy wrote:
 On Wednesday, 11 December 2024 at 08:25:14 UTC, Anton Pastukhov 
 wrote:
array2d, array3d

 Isn't there a consensus that it's called Vector?

 c++ lacks any taste in api, its opinion should be held in 
 negative value

those poor mathematicians, they've been brainwashed by c++ folks

Timon Gehr <timon.gehr gmx.ch> writes:

On 12/12/24 10:02, evilrat wrote:
 On Wednesday, 11 December 2024 at 15:39:35 UTC, monkyyy wrote:
 On Wednesday, 11 December 2024 at 08:25:14 UTC, Anton Pastukhov wrote:
 array2d, array3d

 Isn't there a consensus that it's called Vector?

 c++ lacks any taste in api, its opinion should be held in negative value

 
 those poor mathematicians, they've been brainwashed by c++ folks

Pretty much. A `vector` ordinarily refers to an element of a vector 
space. I think resisting this terminology is valid, particularly as a 
mathematician.

Calling general arrays vectors is about as silly as calling general 
functions vectors, it's just that one of these has kind of caught on. I 
still think it is more weird to criticize an array API for _not_ using 
"vector" than for using "vector".