• zz (7/7) Jan 08 2007 Here are the differences when compiled using DMC.
• janderson (4/15) Jan 08 2007 Wow, is there anyway of getting this or something like it into the

zz <zz zz.com> writes:

Here are the differences when compiled using DMC.
See the othe thread on how to get nedmalloc to compile under DMC.

dmc -o -DNDEBUG -DWIN32 -D_WIN32_WINNT=0x0501 test.c

Standard DMC allocator:  624583.696090 ops/sec under 2 threads.
Nedmalloc allocator:    3109062.452439 ops/sec under 2 threads.

Nedmalloc is 4.977816 times faster than standard.

Zz

janderson <askme me.com> writes:

zz wrote:
 Here are the differences when compiled using DMC.
 See the othe thread on how to get nedmalloc to compile under DMC.
 
 dmc -o -DNDEBUG -DWIN32 -D_WIN32_WINNT=0x0501 test.c
 
 Standard DMC allocator:  624583.696090 ops/sec under 2 threads.
 Nedmalloc allocator:    3109062.452439 ops/sec under 2 threads.
 
 Nedmalloc is 4.977816 times faster than standard.
 
 Zz

Wow, is there anyway of getting this or something like it into the 
standard library?

-Joel