digitalmars.D.learn - very newbie question (sring confusion)
- Lloyd Dupont (14/14) Jun 03 2011 maybe it's late, or I have a hard time reading the string and array clas...
- Lloyd Dupont (49/49) Jun 03 2011 I did the following, what do you think of my implementation?
- bearophile (5/6) Jun 03 2011 Those for loops seem better as foreach ones, or even reverse foreach one...
- Lloyd Dupont (8/9) Jun 03 2011 std.algorithm!
- Jonathan M Davis (3/56) Jun 03 2011 You should probably take a look at std.algorithm.find.
maybe it's late, or I have a hard time reading the string and array class methods.. (which I have! :~) anyway, I have a very simple problem and it seems hard to fix! let say I have a list of resource named preferential order (favored first) and I'd like to do return a list of match in preferential order (with always the default last) for example: my resources (default first): "en-AU", "fr-FR", "fr-BE" my matches: for xxxx i'd like to return a variable list / array xxx "en-US" => "en-AU" "fr-CA" => "fr-FR", "en-AU" "fr-BE" => "fr-BE", "en-AU" "es-EP" => "en-AU" how could I do that?
Jun 03 2011
I did the following, what do you think of my implementation? (checking if my string and array usage could be improved / powered up!!!????) string[] _locales = ["en-AU", "fr-FR"]; string getCurrentLocal() { return "fr-BE"; } string[] getCandidates() { auto local = getCurrentLocal(); string match = null; for (int i = _locales.length; i-->0;) { if(_locales[i] == local) { match = _locales[i]; break; } } string partial = null; if(local.length >= 2 && match == null) { for (int i = _locales.length; i-->0;) { auto tmpl = _locales[i]; if (tmpl.length > 2 && tmpl[0] == local[0] && tmpl[1] == local[1]) { partial = tmpl; break; } } } string[] result; if(match) { result.length = result.length + 1; result[result.length-1] = match; } if(partial && partial != match) { result.length = result.length + 1; result[result.length-1] = partial; } if(match != _locales[0] && partial != _locales[0]) { result.length = result.length + 1; result[result.length-1] = _locales[0]; } return result; }
Jun 03 2011
Lloyd Dupont:I did the following, what do you think of my implementation?Those for loops seem better as foreach ones, or even reverse foreach ones. Probably in std.algorithm there is stuff to shorten your code. Bye, bearophile
Jun 03 2011
std.algorithm! will have a look, thanks! "bearophile" wrote in message news:isb5ql$1i23$1 digitalmars.com... Lloyd Dupont:I did the following, what do you think of my implementation?Those for loops seem better as foreach ones, or even reverse foreach ones. Probably in std.algorithm there is stuff to shorten your code. Bye, bearophile
Jun 03 2011
On 2011-06-03 09:55, Lloyd Dupont wrote:I did the following, what do you think of my implementation? (checking if my string and array usage could be improved / powered up!!!????) string[] _locales = ["en-AU", "fr-FR"]; string getCurrentLocal() { return "fr-BE"; } string[] getCandidates() { auto local = getCurrentLocal(); string match = null; for (int i = _locales.length; i-->0;) { if(_locales[i] == local) { match = _locales[i]; break; } } string partial = null; if(local.length >= 2 && match == null) { for (int i = _locales.length; i-->0;) { auto tmpl = _locales[i]; if (tmpl.length > 2 && tmpl[0] == local[0] && tmpl[1] == local[1]) { partial = tmpl; break; } } } string[] result; if(match) { result.length = result.length + 1; result[result.length-1] = match; } if(partial && partial != match) { result.length = result.length + 1; result[result.length-1] = partial; } if(match != _locales[0] && partial != _locales[0]) { result.length = result.length + 1; result[result.length-1] = _locales[0]; } return result; }You should probably take a look at std.algorithm.find. - Jonathan M Davis
Jun 03 2011