• Lutger (2/2) Oct 08 2006 Is std.perf just undocumented because of the doxygen thing, or is it not...
• Chris Nicholson-Sauls (6/8) Oct 09 2006 Honestly, I think its just an oversight. D's perf module is actually a ...
• Lutger (5/17) Oct 10 2006 I see, that explains the doxygen doc. It seems that ddoc can deal with

Lutger <lutger.blijdestijn gmail.com> writes:

Is std.perf just undocumented because of the doxygen thing, or is it not 
an official part of Phobos? I couldn't google-fu the answer.

Chris Nicholson-Sauls <ibisbasenji gmail.com> writes:

Lutger wrote:
 Is std.perf just undocumented because of the doxygen thing, or is it not 
 an official part of Phobos? I couldn't google-fu the answer.

Honestly, I think its just an oversight.  D's perf module is actually a port,
however, of 
a C++ library (STLSoft:WinSTL).  The best I can recommend is to examine the D
source 
(dmd/src/phobos/std/perf.d) and the documentation for the C++ version:
http://synesis.com.au/software/stlsoft/help/group__winstl__perf__library.html

-- Christopher Nicholson-Sauls

Lutger <lutger.blijdestijn gmail.com> writes:

I see, that explains the doxygen doc. It seems that ddoc can deal with 
doxygen in a reasonable way though. Initially I thought it might be like 
recls, still shipped with phobos but not really a part of it as I 
understand.

Chris Nicholson-Sauls wrote:
 Lutger wrote:
 Is std.perf just undocumented because of the doxygen thing, or is it 
 not an official part of Phobos? I couldn't google-fu the answer.

 
 Honestly, I think its just an oversight.  D's perf module is actually a 
 port, however, of a C++ library (STLSoft:WinSTL).  The best I can 
 recommend is to examine the D source (dmd/src/phobos/std/perf.d) and the 
 documentation for the C++ version:
 http://synesis.com.au/software/stlsoft/help/group__winstl__perf__library.html 
 
 
 -- Christopher Nicholson-Sauls