• Jack Applegame (23/23) Apr 20 2023 Can anyone help me get rid of this depreciation?
• Dennis (7/8) Apr 20 2023 Annotate `getFoo` with `return scope`:
• Jack Applegame (11/20) Apr 20 2023 Wow. Thanks.

Jack Applegame <japplegame gmail.com> writes:

Can anyone help me get rid of this depreciation?

```d
struct Foo {
	string foo;
	string getFoo() const  safe { return foo; }
}

size_t bar(in Foo foo)  safe {
	return foo.getFoo().length;
}

void main() {
	Foo("hello").bar().writeln();
}
```
```sh
$ ldc2 -preview=in --run foo.d
foo.d(9): Deprecation: scope variable `foo` assigned to non-scope 
parameter `this` calling `getFoo`
```
```sh
$ ldc2 --version
LDC - the LLVM D compiler (1.32.1):
   based on DMD v2.102.2 and LLVM 15.0.7
```

Dennis <dkorpel gmail.com> writes:

On Thursday, 20 April 2023 at 09:14:48 UTC, Jack Applegame wrote:
 Can anyone help me get rid of this depreciation?

Annotate `getFoo` with `return scope`:

```d
struct Foo {
	string foo;
	string getFoo() return scope const  safe { return foo; }
}

Jack Applegame <japplegame gmail.com> writes:

On Thursday, 20 April 2023 at 09:41:13 UTC, Dennis wrote:
 On Thursday, 20 April 2023 at 09:14:48 UTC, Jack Applegame 
 wrote:
 Can anyone help me get rid of this depreciation?

 Annotate `getFoo` with `return scope`:

 ```d
 struct Foo {
 	string foo;
 	string getFoo() return scope const  safe { return foo; }
 }

Wow. Thanks.
I tried this, but rearranged the return and scope like this
```d
// doesn't work
string getFoo() scope return const  safe { return foo; }
```
```d
// works
string getFoo() return scope const  safe { return foo; }
```