• jicman (13/13) Aug 24 2007 Greetings.
• mandel (2/3) Aug 25 2007 v.byref = cast(void*) value,
• jicman (2/5) Aug 25 2007 Thanks.
• torhu (4/20) Aug 25 2007 According to the changelog, this conversion stopped being implicit in
• jicman (4/7) Aug 25 2007 1.007, 1.009, 1.018, tomato, toh-mah-toh... :-) Kidding. Ok, thanks, c...

jicman <cabrera wrc.xerox.com> writes:

Greetings.

After upgrading dmd to v1.018, I am getting this error,

C:\cygwin\home\us319318\source\d\jic\libs\COM\Object.d(326): Error: cannot
implicitly convert expression (value) of type object.Object to void*

which worked fine with version 1.009.  Here is the code that is causing this
problem,

  static VARIANT opCall(Object value) {
    VARIANT v;
    return v.vt = VT_BYREF,
      v.byref = value,
      v;
  }

How can I fix this?  Sorry if this has been posted before, but I could not find
this in digitalmars site.

thanks,

jic

mandel <mandel foobar.com> writes:

       v.byref = value,

        v.byref = cast(void*) value,
I think you forgot to cast the value.

jicman <cabrera_ _wrc.xerox.com> writes:

== Quote from mandel (mandel foobar.com)'s article
       v.byref = value,

         v.byref = cast(void*) value,
 I think you forgot to cast the value.

Thanks.

torhu <no spam.invalid> writes:

jicman wrote:
 Greetings.
 
 After upgrading dmd to v1.018, I am getting this error,
 
 C:\cygwin\home\us319318\source\d\jic\libs\COM\Object.d(326): Error: cannot
implicitly convert expression (value) of type object.Object to void*
 
 which worked fine with version 1.009.  Here is the code that is causing this
problem,
 
   static VARIANT opCall(Object value) {
     VARIANT v;
     return v.vt = VT_BYREF,
       v.byref = value,
       v;
   }
 
 How can I fix this?  Sorry if this has been posted before, but I could not
find this in digitalmars site.

According to the changelog, this conversion stopped being implicit in 
1.007, so it shouldn't work with 1.009 either.  Either cast or compile 
with -v1 or -d (can't remember which one it is).

jicman <cabrera_SP M_wrc.xerox.com> writes:

== Quote from torhu's article
 According to the changelog, this conversion stopped being implicit in
 1.007, so it shouldn't work with 1.009 either.  Either cast or compile
 with -v1 or -d (can't remember which one it is).

1.007, 1.009, 1.018, tomato, toh-mah-toh... :-)  Kidding.  Ok, thanks, casting
it
worked.

thanks.