• Clay Smith (8/8) Nov 25 2007 C++ memmove:
• Clay Smith (3/16) Nov 25 2007 Oh, and bounds in the C++ version is a pointer, while in the D version
• Bill Baxter (4/21) Nov 25 2007 Looks ok, unless b2Bound is a class. Then the sizeof would be giving

Clay Smith <clayasaurus gmail.com> writes:

C++ memmove:

memmove(bounds + upperIndex + 2, bounds + upperIndex, (edgeCount - 
upperIndex) * sizeof(b2Bound));

D memmove:

memmove(bounds.ptr + upperIndex + 2, bounds.ptr + upperIndex, (edgeCount 
- upperIndex) * b2Bound.sizeof);

Is this a correct translation to D? Thanks.

~ Clay

Clay Smith <clayasaurus gmail.com> writes:

Clay Smith wrote:
 C++ memmove:
 
 memmove(bounds + upperIndex + 2, bounds + upperIndex, (edgeCount - 
 upperIndex) * sizeof(b2Bound));
 
 D memmove:
 
 memmove(bounds.ptr + upperIndex + 2, bounds.ptr + upperIndex, (edgeCount 
 - upperIndex) * b2Bound.sizeof);
 
 Is this a correct translation to D? Thanks.
 
 ~ Clay

Oh, and bounds in the C++ version is a pointer, while in the D version 
is an array.

Bill Baxter <dnewsgroup billbaxter.com> writes:

Clay Smith wrote:
 Clay Smith wrote:
 C++ memmove:

 memmove(bounds + upperIndex + 2, bounds + upperIndex, (edgeCount - 
 upperIndex) * sizeof(b2Bound));

 D memmove:

 memmove(bounds.ptr + upperIndex + 2, bounds.ptr + upperIndex, 
 (edgeCount - upperIndex) * b2Bound.sizeof);

 Is this a correct translation to D? Thanks.

 ~ Clay

 
 Oh, and bounds in the C++ version is a pointer, while in the D version 
 is an array.

Looks ok, unless b2Bound is a class.  Then the sizeof would be giving 
you the size of just the reference to the class.

--bb