www.digitalmars.com         C & C++   DMDScript  

digitalmars.D.learn - foreach () processing sequence

reply jicman <cabrera wrc.xerox.com> writes:
Greetings!

Imagine this declarion,

char[] str = ["bb", "cc", "aa", "00", "11", "zz", "dd"];

when I do a,

foreach (char[] s; str)
  writefln(s);

assuming that the str array has not been touched or altered in any
way, will the sequence of execution **ALWAYS** follow the sequence
of the array creation?  In other words, will the execution of the
foreach above always display,

bb
cc
aa
00
11
zz
dd

Thanks,

josé
Feb 06 2007
parent reply Kirk McDonald <kirklin.mcdonald gmail.com> writes:
jicman wrote:

 Greetings!
 
 Imagine this declarion,
 
 char[] str = ["bb", "cc", "aa", "00", "11", "zz", "dd"];
 
 when I do a,
 
 foreach (char[] s; str)
   writefln(s);
 
 assuming that the str array has not been touched or altered in any
 way, will the sequence of execution **ALWAYS** follow the sequence
 of the array creation?  In other words, will the execution of the
 foreach above always display,
 
 bb
 cc
 aa
 00
 11
 zz
 dd
 
 Thanks,
 
 jos�


(Nitpick: The type of str is char[][].)

Yes. An array is an ordered sequence. (As opposed to, say, a hash table, 
which is unordered.)

-- 
Kirk McDonald
Pyd: Wrapping Python with D
http://pyd.dsource.org
Feb 06 2007
parent reply jicman <cabrera wrc.xerox.com> writes:
== Quote from Kirk McDonald's article

 jicman wrote:

 Greetings!

 Imagine this declarion,

 char[] str = ["bb", "cc", "aa", "00", "11", "zz", "dd"];

 when I do a,

 foreach (char[] s; str)
   writefln(s);

 assuming that the str array has not been touched or altered in




any

 way, will the sequence of execution **ALWAYS** follow the




sequence

 of the array creation?  In other words, will the execution of the
 foreach above always display,

 bb
 cc
 aa
 00
 11
 zz
 dd

 Thanks,

 jos�


 (Nitpick: The type of str is char[][].)
 Yes. An array is an ordered sequence. (As opposed to, say, a hash


table,

 which is unordered.)


You're not nitpick, but acurate. :-)

Ok, thanks.
Feb 06 2007
parent reply Johan Granberg <lijat.meREM OVE.gmail.com> writes:
jicman wrote:


 == Quote from Kirk McDonald's article

 jicman wrote:

 Greetings!

 Imagine this declarion,

 char[] str = ["bb", "cc", "aa", "00", "11", "zz", "dd"];

 when I do a,

 foreach (char[] s; str)
   writefln(s);

 assuming that the str array has not been touched or altered in




 any

 way, will the sequence of execution **ALWAYS** follow the




 sequence

 of the array creation?  In other words, will the execution of the
 foreach above always display,

 bb
 cc
 aa
 00
 11
 zz
 dd

 Thanks,

 jos�


 (Nitpick: The type of str is char[][].)
 Yes. An array is an ordered sequence. (As opposed to, say, a hash


 table,

 which is unordered.)


 
 You're not nitpick, but acurate. :-)
 
 Ok, thanks.


I have wondered the same in the past. Is it documented somewhere? otherwise
I think it should be.
Feb 06 2007
parent reply jicman <cabrera wrc.xerox.com> writes:
== Quote from Johan Granberg's article

 jicman wrote:

 == Quote from Kirk McDonald's article

 jicman wrote:

 Greetings!

 Imagine this declarion,

 char[] str = ["bb", "cc", "aa", "00", "11", "zz", "dd"];

 when I do a,

 foreach (char[] s; str)
   writefln(s);

 assuming that the str array has not been touched or altered in




 any

 way, will the sequence of execution **ALWAYS** follow the




 sequence

 of the array creation?  In other words, will the execution of








the

 foreach above always display,

 bb
 cc
 aa
 00
 11
 zz
 dd

 Thanks,

 jos�


 (Nitpick: The type of str is char[][].)
 Yes. An array is an ordered sequence. (As opposed to, say, a






hash

 table,

 which is unordered.)


 You're not nitpick, but acurate. :-)

 Ok, thanks.


 I have wondered the same in the past. Is it documented somewhere?


otherwise

 I think it should be.


I agree.  I was just going to write a function to make sure that the
the creation sequence was the sequence that it would execute on a
foreach().
Feb 06 2007
parent Carlos Santander <csantander619 gmail.com> writes:
jicman escribió:

 == Quote from Johan Granberg's article

 jicman wrote:

 == Quote from Kirk McDonald's article

 jicman wrote:

 Greetings!
 
 Imagine this declarion,
 
 char[] str = ["bb", "cc", "aa", "00", "11", "zz", "dd"];
 
 when I do a,
 
 foreach (char[] s; str) writefln(s);
 
 assuming that the str array has not been touched or altered in




 any

 way, will the sequence of execution **ALWAYS** follow the




 sequence

 of the array creation?  In other words, will the execution of








 the

 foreach above always display,
 
 bb cc aa 00 11 zz dd
 
 Thanks,
 
 jos�


 (Nitpick: The type of str is char[][].) Yes. An array is an ordered
 sequence. (As opposed to, say, a






 hash

 table,

 which is unordered.)


 You're not nitpick, but acurate. :-)
 
 Ok, thanks.


 I have wondered the same in the past. Is it documented somewhere?


 otherwise

 I think it should be.


 
 I agree.  I was just going to write a function to make sure that the the
 creation sequence was the sequence that it would execute on a foreach().


Check http://www.digitalmars.com/d/statement.html#ForeachStatement :

 For foreach, the elements for the array are iterated over starting at index 0
 and continuing to the maximum of the array. For foreach_reverse, the array
 elements are visited in the reverse order.



-- 
Carlos Santander Bernal
Feb 06 2007