digitalmars.D.learn - Zero length arrays in D
- Eduard Staniloiu (21/21) Feb 18 2019 Hello
- H. S. Teoh (18/35) Feb 18 2019 Huh. I didn't even know D was supposed to support this. I found a few
Hello According to the spec[0], D supports zero length arrays [1]. I have given this a shot at https://run.dlang.io/is/PwbPxJ Attempting to use the zero-length array results in a compiler error `a.contents[2]` -> Error: array index 2 is out of bounds (*a).contents[0 .. 0] The way I've used around this error is "safely" break/trick the type system ``` int *p = a.contents.ptr; int[] p_cont = p[0 .. n]; p_cont[2] = 10; // fine ``` Is this the intended way of working with zero length arrays? Cheers, Edi [0] - https://dlang.org/spec/arrays.html#static-arrays, best practices pt 2 [1] - https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.7.4/gcc/Zero-Length.html
Feb 18 2019
On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 01:34:37PM +0000, Eduard Staniloiu via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:Hello According to the spec[0], D supports zero length arrays [1].Huh. I didn't even know D was supposed to support this. I found a few examples of this usage in Adam Ruppe's arsd code, where the zero-length array is sliced as you indicated: struct X { int[0] data; } X* x = ...; int[] arr = x.data.ptr[0 .. n]; arr[i] = ...; [...]Attempting to use the zero-length array results in a compiler error `a.contents[2]` -> Error: array index 2 is out of bounds (*a).contents[0 .. 0]Yeah this needs to be explicated in the docs / spec.The way I've used around this error is "safely" break/trick the type system ``` int *p = a.contents.ptr; int[] p_cont = p[0 .. n]; p_cont[2] = 10; // fine ``` Is this the intended way of working with zero length arrays?[...] No idea. But it's probably the only way of actually using them right now. :-D The spec / docs need to be updated. T -- Long, long ago, the ancient Chinese invented a device that lets them see through walls. It was called the "window".
Feb 18 2019