digitalmars.D.learn - UTF-8 strings and endianness
- denizzzka (3/3) Oct 29 2012 Hi!
- Adam D. Ruppe (1/1) Oct 29 2012 UTF-8 isn't affected by endianness.
- denizzzka (2/3) Oct 29 2012 Ok, thanks!
- Jesse Phillips (4/5) Oct 30 2012 If this is true why does the BOM have marks for big and little
- Tobias Pankrath (2/7) Oct 30 2012 UTF8 has only one?
- Dmitry Olshansky (5/15) Oct 30 2012 to signal at the start that the text stream is encoded in UTF-8
- Jesse Phillips (3/14) Oct 30 2012 oops, mixed up and thought he just said "UTF isn't ..."
- Jordi Sayol (4/10) Oct 29 2012 UTF-8 is always big emdian.
Hi! How to convert D's string to big endian? How to convert to D's string from big endian?
Oct 29 2012
"denizzzka" <4denizzz gmail.com> On Monday, 29 October 2012 at 15:22:39 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:UTF-8 isn't affected by endianness.Ok, thanks!
Oct 29 2012
On Monday, 29 October 2012 at 15:22:39 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:UTF-8 isn't affected by endianness.If this is true why does the BOM have marks for big and little endian? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Byte_order_mark#Representations_of_byte_order_marks_by_encoding
Oct 30 2012
On Tuesday, 30 October 2012 at 17:12:41 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote:On Monday, 29 October 2012 at 15:22:39 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:UTF8 has only one?UTF-8 isn't affected by endianness.If this is true why does the BOM have marks for big and little endian? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Byte_order_mark#Representations_of_byte_order_marks_by_encoding
Oct 30 2012
10/30/2012 5:17 PM, Tobias Pankrath пишет:On Tuesday, 30 October 2012 at 17:12:41 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote:Even Wiki knows the simple truth:On Monday, 29 October 2012 at 15:22:39 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:UTF8 has only one?UTF-8 isn't affected by endianness.If this is true why does the BOM have marks for big and little endian? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Byte_order_mark#Representations_of_byte_order_marks_by_encodingByte order has no meaning in UTF-8, [5] so its only use in UTF-8 isto signal at the start that the text stream is encoded in UTF-8 -- Dmitry Olshansky
Oct 30 2012
On Tuesday, 30 October 2012 at 17:17:36 UTC, Tobias Pankrath wrote:On Tuesday, 30 October 2012 at 17:12:41 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote:oops, mixed up and thought he just said "UTF isn't ..."On Monday, 29 October 2012 at 15:22:39 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:UTF8 has only one?UTF-8 isn't affected by endianness.If this is true why does the BOM have marks for big and little endian? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Byte_order_mark#Representations_of_byte_order_marks_by_encoding
Oct 30 2012
Al 29/10/12 16:17, En/na denizzzka ha escrit:Hi! How to convert D's string to big endian? How to convert to D's string from big endian?UTF-8 is always big emdian. -- Jordi Sayol
Oct 29 2012
On Monday, 29 October 2012 at 15:46:43 UTC, Jordi Sayol wrote:Al 29/10/12 16:17, En/na denizzzka ha escrit:Yes. (I thought that the problem in this place but the problem was different.)Hi! How to convert D's string to big endian? How to convert to D's string from big endian?UTF-8 is always big emdian.
Oct 29 2012
On Monday, 29 October 2012 at 15:46:43 UTC, Jordi Sayol wrote:Al 29/10/12 16:17, En/na denizzzka ha escrit:oops, what? Q: Is the UTF-8 encoding scheme the same irrespective of whether the underlying processor is little endian or big endian? A: Yes. Since UTF-8 is interpreted as a sequence of bytes, there is no endian problem as there is for encoding forms that use 16-bit or 32-bit code units. Where a BOM is used with UTF-8, it is only used as an ecoding signature to distinguish UTF-8 from other encodings — it has nothing to do with byte order.Hi! How to convert D's string to big endian? How to convert to D's string from big endian?UTF-8 is always big emdian.
Oct 29 2012