• =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Pelle_M=E5nsson?= (6/6) Jan 25 2010 I'm in need for a timer library that measures the acutal time. I have
• Stanislav Blinov (2/10) Jan 25 2010 Have you tried std.date? :-)
• strtr (2/13) Jan 25 2010 and there is of course the undocumented std.perf.
• Lars T. Kyllingstad (4/18) Jan 25 2010 It's not undocumented, it's just badly linked-to. :)
• strtr (2/7) Jan 25 2010 http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/phobos/std_perf.html
• =?UTF-8?B?UGVsbGUgTcOlbnNzb24=?= (2/15) Jan 25 2010 It seems std.perf is indeed suitable. Thank you!

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Pelle_M=E5nsson?= <pelle.mansson gmail.com> writes:

I'm in need for a timer library that measures the acutal time. I have 
tried std.c.time's clock(), but it only measures time spent inside the 
program, not actual time elapsed.

I need at least millisecond resolution, so std.c.time.time() is not an 
option.

I wonder, is there a good library for this?

Stanislav Blinov <stanislav.blinov gmail.com> writes:

Pelle Månsson wrote:
 I'm in need for a timer library that measures the acutal time. I have 
 tried std.c.time's clock(), but it only measures time spent inside the 
 program, not actual time elapsed.
 
 I need at least millisecond resolution, so std.c.time.time() is not an 
 option.
 
 I wonder, is there a good library for this?

Have you tried std.date? :-)

strtr <strtr spam.com> writes:

Stanislav Blinov Wrote:

 Pelle Månsson wrote:
 I'm in need for a timer library that measures the acutal time. I have 
 tried std.c.time's clock(), but it only measures time spent inside the 
 program, not actual time elapsed.
 
 I need at least millisecond resolution, so std.c.time.time() is not an 
 option.
 
 I wonder, is there a good library for this?

 
 Have you tried std.date? :-)

and there is of course the undocumented std.perf.

"Lars T. Kyllingstad" <public kyllingen.NOSPAMnet> writes:

strtr wrote:
 Stanislav Blinov Wrote:
 
 Pelle M幩sson wrote:
 I'm in need for a timer library that measures the acutal time. I have 
 tried std.c.time's clock(), but it only measures time spent inside the 
 program, not actual time elapsed.

 I need at least millisecond resolution, so std.c.time.time() is not an 
 option.

 I wonder, is there a good library for this?

 Have you tried std.date? :-)

 
 and there is of course the undocumented std.perf.

It's not undocumented, it's just badly linked-to. :)

http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/phobos/std_perf.html

-Lars

strtr <strtr spam.com> writes:

Lars T. Kyllingstad Wrote:

 It's not undocumented, it's just badly linked-to. :)
 
 http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/phobos/std_perf.html
 
 -Lars

http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/phobos/std_perf.html

=?UTF-8?B?UGVsbGUgTcOlbnNzb24=?= <pelle.mansson gmail.com> writes:

On 01/25/2010 04:02 PM, strtr wrote:
 Stanislav Blinov Wrote:

 Pelle M�nsson wrote:
 I'm in need for a timer library that measures the acutal time. I have
 tried std.c.time's clock(), but it only measures time spent inside the
 program, not actual time elapsed.

 I need at least millisecond resolution, so std.c.time.time() is not an
 option.

 I wonder, is there a good library for this?

 Have you tried std.date? :-)

 and there is of course the undocumented std.perf.

It seems std.perf is indeed suitable. Thank you!