digitalmars.D.learn - Template mixin + operator overloading question
- Boyan Lazov (52/52) Oct 11 2019 Hello,
- Dennis (3/4) Oct 11 2019 Nothing, it's a bug.
- Boyan Lazov (4/8) Oct 11 2019 Alright, I see
Hello,
I seem to have a problem when I use a template mixin and then try
to overload operators both in the mixin and in a struct from
where it's instantiated.
So the idea is that I have a few operators defined in the mixin,
then a few more in the struct, and I want to forward all
operations not explicitly defined in the struct to the ones in
the mixin (and I don't want to do alias this for a variety of
unrelated reasons).
Basically the simplest code that gives me problems is:
import std.stdio;
mixin template Impl(T) {
T v;
int opBinary(string s: "+")(T other) {
writeln("Single +");
return 0;
}
int opBinary(string s: "+")(T[] other) {
writeln("Array +");
return 0;
}
}
struct Pt {
mixin Impl!float impl;
int opBinary(string s: "*")(float other) {
writeln("Single *");
return 0;
}
int opBinary(string s, T)(T v) {
//Pt already has opBinary defined, so the operators in
the mixin not visible
//Thought that delegating to the mixin should be done
this way
writeln("Delegate ", s);
return impl.opBinary!(s)(v);
}
}
void main() {
Pt pt;
int r = pt + [1f, 2f];
writeln("R: ", r);
}
This results in an infinite loop though. Seems like
Pt.opBinary!("+", float[]) is called over and over. Which is a
bit un-intuitive to me - I'm not sure why calling
impl.opBinary!(s) can result in endless recursion.
The problem appears only when I have 2 operators in the mixin
that I try to forward to - e.g. the two overloads of "+" in this
case. If I have just 1, it works ok, if I have none, the error
message is helpful.
Any ideas what I'm doing wrong?
Thanks!
Oct 11 2019
On Friday, 11 October 2019 at 12:45:59 UTC, Boyan Lazov wrote:Any ideas what I'm doing wrong?Nothing, it's a bug. https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19476
Oct 11 2019
On Friday, 11 October 2019 at 13:13:46 UTC, Dennis wrote:On Friday, 11 October 2019 at 12:45:59 UTC, Boyan Lazov wrote:Alright, I see Well, the alias workaround works, so that seems just as good. Thanks!Any ideas what I'm doing wrong?Nothing, it's a bug. https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19476
Oct 11 2019








Boyan Lazov <boyan.lazov gmail.com>