digitalmars.D.learn - Stream-Based Processing of Range Chunks in D
- =?UTF-8?B?Ik5vcmRsw7Z3Ig==?= (31/31) Dec 10 2013 I'm looking for an elegant way to perform chunk-stream-based
- qznc (14/47) Dec 10 2013 You could make a range step for each kind of statistic, which
- Philippe Sigaud (16/24) Dec 10 2013 Concerning the put, you could have an auxiliary function that's
I'm looking for an elegant way to perform chunk-stream-based processing of arrays/ranges. I'm building a file indexing/search engine in D that calculates various kinds of statistics on files such as histograms and SHA1-digests. I want these calculations to be performed in a single pass with regards to data-access locality. Here is an excerpt from the engine /** Process File in Cache Friendly Chunks. */ void calculateCStatInChunks(immutable (ubyte[]) src, size_t chunkSize, bool doSHA1, bool doBHist8) { if (!_cstat.contentsDigest[].allZeros) { doSHA1 = false; } if (!_cstat.bhist8.allZeros) { doBHist8 = false; } import std.digest.sha; SHA1 sha1; if (doSHA1) { sha1.start(); } import std.range: chunks; foreach (chunk; src.chunks(chunkSize)) { if (doSHA1) { sha1.put(chunk); } if (doBHist8) { /*...*/ } } if (doSHA1) { _cstat.contentsDigest = sha1.finish(); } } Seemingly this is not a very elegant (functional) approach as I have to spread logic for each statistics (reducer) across three different places in the code, namely `start`, `put` and `finish`. Does anybody have suggestions/references on Haskell-monad-like stream based APIs that can make this code more D-style component-based?
Dec 10 2013
On Tuesday, 10 December 2013 at 09:57:44 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:I'm looking for an elegant way to perform chunk-stream-based processing of arrays/ranges. I'm building a file indexing/search engine in D that calculates various kinds of statistics on files such as histograms and SHA1-digests. I want these calculations to be performed in a single pass with regards to data-access locality. Here is an excerpt from the engine /** Process File in Cache Friendly Chunks. */ void calculateCStatInChunks(immutable (ubyte[]) src, size_t chunkSize, bool doSHA1, bool doBHist8) { if (!_cstat.contentsDigest[].allZeros) { doSHA1 = false; } if (!_cstat.bhist8.allZeros) { doBHist8 = false; } import std.digest.sha; SHA1 sha1; if (doSHA1) { sha1.start(); } import std.range: chunks; foreach (chunk; src.chunks(chunkSize)) { if (doSHA1) { sha1.put(chunk); } if (doBHist8) { /*...*/ } } if (doSHA1) { _cstat.contentsDigest = sha1.finish(); } } Seemingly this is not a very elegant (functional) approach as I have to spread logic for each statistics (reducer) across three different places in the code, namely `start`, `put` and `finish`. Does anybody have suggestions/references on Haskell-monad-like stream based APIs that can make this code more D-style component-based?You could make a range step for each kind of statistic, which outputs the input range unchanged and does its job as a side effect. SHA1 sha1; src.chunks(chunkSize) .add_sha1(doSHA1, &sha1) .add_bhist(doBHist8) .strict_consuming(); You could try to use constructor/destructor mechanisms for sha1.start and sha1.finish. Or at least scope guards: SHA1 sha1; if (doSHA1) { sha1.start(); } scope(exit) if (doSHA1) { _cstat.contentsDigest = sha1.finish(); }
Dec 10 2013
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 10:57 AM, "Nordlöw" <per.nordlow gmail.com> wrote:I'm looking for an elegant way to perform chunk-stream-based processing of arrays/ranges. I'm building a file indexing/search engine in D that calculates various kinds of statistics on files such as histograms and SHA1-digests. I want these calculations to be performed in a single pass with regards to data-access locality.Seemingly this is not a very elegant (functional) approach as I have to spread logic for each statistics (reducer) across three different places in the code, namely `start`, `put` and `finish`.Concerning the put, you could have an auxiliary function that's defined only once: void delegate( /*typeofChunk?*/ chunk) worker, sha, bhist8; if (doSHA1) sha = (chunk) { sha1.put(chunk);} else sha = (chunk) {} if (doBhist8) bhist8 = (chunk) { /*some BHist8 work*/} else bhist8 = (chunk) {} worker = (chunk) { sha(chunk); bist8(chunk};} ... foreach (chunk; src.chunks(chunkSize)) worker(chunk);
Dec 10 2013