digitalmars.D.learn - Strange DSSS/Tango compile error
- Robert Kosek (14/43) Oct 15 2008 Hi all,
- Jarrett Billingsley (4/48) Oct 15 2008 It just looks like it's not linking in the Tango libraries. I thought
- Robert Kosek (16/27) Oct 15 2008 That's the odd part, it usually does! In fact, the above command line
- Jarrett Billingsley (7/36) Oct 15 2008 Oh, I just realized what it is, I think. Don't build dice.d, dsss
- Robert Kosek (7/19) Oct 15 2008 Hmm, that's an interesting idea. However, if I do that I get the
- Sergey Gromov (8/27) Oct 15 2008 May I recommend you to try 'bud' ?
- Bill Baxter (6/33) Oct 15 2008 The most recent release of DSSS/rebuild takes a long long time to
- Robert Kosek (6/15) Oct 15 2008 Thanks for the recommendation. That, plus one other thing, fixed my
- Jarrett Billingsley (5/19) Oct 15 2008 Keep in mind, though, that Bud is ancient and the author has, I
- Bill Baxter (15/36) Oct 15 2008 Well, part right.
- Chris R. Miller (2/38) Oct 15 2008 Or learn how to write makefiles... yuk!
- Mike Parker (5/46) Oct 15 2008 Or maybe some enterprising soul could modify PreMake[1] to generate
- Chris R. Miller (4/52) Oct 15 2008 Hmm, in the mean time, I did run across an interesting (and delightfully...
- =?UTF-8?B?QWxleGFuZGVyIFDDoW5law==?= (5/8) Oct 15 2008 I try to help out Gregor the best I can, though I can not promise to
Hi all, I'm writing a very simplistic RPG in D to learn the language, and my Dice structure seems to have some kind of problem. All it does it wraps dice rolls into a reusable wrapper. Only, the compile is completely botched! Here's what happens:g> dsss build dice.d rpg.d dice.d => dice + C:\utils\dmd\dsss\bin\rebuild.exe -Idsss_imports\ -I. -S.\ -IC:\utils\dmd\dsss \include\d -SC:\utils\dmd\dsss\lib\ -IC:\utils\dmd\dsss\include\d -SC:\utils\dm d\dsss\lib -oqdsss_objs\D dice.d -ofdice OPTLINK (R) for Win32 Release 8.00.1 Copyright (C) Digital Mars 1989-2004 All rights reserved. dsss_objs\D\rpg-dice.obj(rpg-dice) Error 42: Symbol Undefined _D10ModuleInfo6__vtblZ dsss_objs\D\tango-math-Random.obj(tango-math-Random) Error 42: Symbol Undefined _D9invariant12_d_invariantFC6ObjectZv dsss_objs\D\tango-math-Random.obj(tango-math-Random) Error 42: Symbol Undefined __d_newclass dsss_objs\D\tango-math-Random.obj(tango-math-Random) Error 42: Symbol Undefined _D6object6Object8opEqualsMFC6ObjectZi dsss_objs\D\tango-math-Random.obj(tango-math-Random) Error 42: Symbol Undefined _D6object6Object5opCmpMFC6ObjectZi dsss_objs\D\tango-math-Random.obj(tango-math-Random) Error 42: Symbol Undefined _D6object6Object6toHashMFZk dsss_objs\D\tango-math-Random.obj(tango-math-Random) Error 42: Symbol Undefined _D6object6Object8toStringMFZAa dsss_objs\D\tango-math-Random.obj(tango-math-Random) Error 42: Symbol Undefined _D6Object7__ClassZ dsss_objs\D\tango-math-Random.obj(tango-math-Random) Error 42: Symbol Undefined _D9ClassInfo6__vtblZ OPTLINK : Warning 134: No Start Address --- errorlevel 9 Command C:\utils\dmd\dsss\bin\rebuild.exe returned with code -1, aborting. Error: Command failed, aborting.I get these errors whether I include tango.math.Rand or tango.math.Random. I am using the latest copy of Easy D (http://www.fsdev.net/versions/show/1) with DMD 1.030 and Tango 0.99.7; I haven't used the other parts yet. I've included the source so you can check it out yourself, just in case I made an error. It's nothing special, and I'm getting no other errors any longer. Thanks in advance for any help you might have. Robert
Oct 15 2008
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 11:11 AM, Robert Kosek <robert.kosek thewickedflea.com> wrote:Hi all, I'm writing a very simplistic RPG in D to learn the language, and my Dice structure seems to have some kind of problem. All it does it wraps dice rolls into a reusable wrapper. Only, the compile is completely botched! Here's what happens:It just looks like it's not linking in the Tango libraries. I thought EasyD would have done that for you.g> dsss build dice.d rpg.d dice.d => dice + C:\utils\dmd\dsss\bin\rebuild.exe -Idsss_imports\ -I. -S.\ -IC:\utils\dmd\dsss \include\d -SC:\utils\dmd\dsss\lib\ -IC:\utils\dmd\dsss\include\d -SC:\utils\dm d\dsss\lib -oqdsss_objs\D dice.d -ofdice OPTLINK (R) for Win32 Release 8.00.1 Copyright (C) Digital Mars 1989-2004 All rights reserved. dsss_objs\D\rpg-dice.obj(rpg-dice) Error 42: Symbol Undefined _D10ModuleInfo6__vtblZ dsss_objs\D\tango-math-Random.obj(tango-math-Random) Error 42: Symbol Undefined _D9invariant12_d_invariantFC6ObjectZv dsss_objs\D\tango-math-Random.obj(tango-math-Random) Error 42: Symbol Undefined __d_newclass dsss_objs\D\tango-math-Random.obj(tango-math-Random) Error 42: Symbol Undefined _D6object6Object8opEqualsMFC6ObjectZi dsss_objs\D\tango-math-Random.obj(tango-math-Random) Error 42: Symbol Undefined _D6object6Object5opCmpMFC6ObjectZi dsss_objs\D\tango-math-Random.obj(tango-math-Random) Error 42: Symbol Undefined _D6object6Object6toHashMFZk dsss_objs\D\tango-math-Random.obj(tango-math-Random) Error 42: Symbol Undefined _D6object6Object8toStringMFZAa dsss_objs\D\tango-math-Random.obj(tango-math-Random) Error 42: Symbol Undefined _D6Object7__ClassZ dsss_objs\D\tango-math-Random.obj(tango-math-Random) Error 42: Symbol Undefined _D9ClassInfo6__vtblZ OPTLINK : Warning 134: No Start Address --- errorlevel 9 Command C:\utils\dmd\dsss\bin\rebuild.exe returned with code -1, aborting. Error: Command failed, aborting.I get these errors whether I include tango.math.Rand or tango.math.Random. I am using the latest copy of Easy D (http://www.fsdev.net/versions/show/1) with DMD 1.030 and Tango 0.99.7; I haven't used the other parts yet. I've included the source so you can check it out yourself, just in case I made an error. It's nothing special, and I'm getting no other errors any longer. Thanks in advance for any help you might have. Robert
Oct 15 2008
Jarrett Billingsley wrote:It just looks like it's not linking in the Tango libraries. I thought EasyD would have done that for you.That's the odd part, it usually does! In fact, the above command line arguments are what are always executed (beyond my specifying which files to build). Here's the thing: if I remove a reference to my rpg.dice module (in dice.d in the same directory) it compiles and links Tango. Thus I think it's not linking *my* code rather than Tango. I think Tango is linking just fine. (Perhaps my private import is the problem?) This compiles:module rpg; import tango.io.Stdout/*, rpg.dice*/; void main() { /* Dice d = {4,6}; Stdout.format("Dice roll is(4d6): {}", d.roll());*/ Stdout("This is a test!").newline.flush; }But to uncomment the pieces for the dice rolling, and my linking dies immediately. What should I do for a project that uses multiple files for its compilation? Should I have any special file system structure within the directory, or should I add a special search path to the build? Thanks, Robert
Oct 15 2008
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 2:13 PM, Robert Kosek <robert.kosek thewickedflea.com> wrote:Jarrett Billingsley wrote:Oh, I just realized what it is, I think. Don't build dice.d, dsss will build it for you automatically. Just do "dsss build rpg.d" and it'll automatically compile and link rpg as well as any dependent modules. I think it's trying to compile dice.d as a program, which of course won't work.It just looks like it's not linking in the Tango libraries. I thought EasyD would have done that for you.That's the odd part, it usually does! In fact, the above command line arguments are what are always executed (beyond my specifying which files to build). Here's the thing: if I remove a reference to my rpg.dice module (in dice.d in the same directory) it compiles and links Tango. Thus I think it's not linking *my* code rather than Tango. I think Tango is linking just fine. (Perhaps my private import is the problem?) This compiles:module rpg; import tango.io.Stdout/*, rpg.dice*/; void main() { /* Dice d = {4,6}; Stdout.format("Dice roll is(4d6): {}", d.roll());*/ Stdout("This is a test!").newline.flush; }But to uncomment the pieces for the dice rolling, and my linking dies immediately. What should I do for a project that uses multiple files for its compilation? Should I have any special file system structure within the directory, or should I add a special search path to the build? Thanks, Robert
Oct 15 2008
Jarrett Billingsley wrote:Oh, I just realized what it is, I think. Don't build dice.d, dsss will build it for you automatically. Just do "dsss build rpg.d" and it'll automatically compile and link rpg as well as any dependent modules. I think it's trying to compile dice.d as a program, which of course won't work.Hmm, that's an interesting idea. However, if I do that I get the following error:dsss build rpg.d rpg.d => rpg + C:\utils\dmd\dsss\bin\rebuild.exe -Idsss_imports\ -I. -S.\ -IC:\utils\dmd\dsss \include\d -SC:\utils\dmd\dsss\lib\ -IC:\utils\dmd\dsss\include\d -SC:\utils\dm d\dsss\lib -oqdsss_objs\D rpg.d -ofrpg Command C:\utils\dmd\dsss\bin\rebuild.exe returned with code 1, aborting. Error: Command failed, aborting.Which I have absolutely no idea what means, nor how to go about fixing it. Thanks for all your help so far. I hope we can figure this out soon. Regards, Robert
Oct 15 2008
Wed, 15 Oct 2008 16:24:42 -0400, Robert Kosek wrote:Jarrett Billingsley wrote:May I recommend you to try 'bud' ? http://dsource.org/projects/build It's a single executable, pretty similar to 'rebuild' and can be used like this: bud rpg.d I've had weird problems with rebuild recently.Oh, I just realized what it is, I think. Don't build dice.d, dsss will build it for you automatically. Just do "dsss build rpg.d" and it'll automatically compile and link rpg as well as any dependent modules. I think it's trying to compile dice.d as a program, which of course won't work.Hmm, that's an interesting idea. However, if I do that I get the following error:dsss build rpg.d rpg.d => rpg + C:\utils\dmd\dsss\bin\rebuild.exe -Idsss_imports\ -I. -S.\ -IC:\utils\dmd\dsss \include\d -SC:\utils\dmd\dsss\lib\ -IC:\utils\dmd\dsss\include\d -SC:\utils\dm d\dsss\lib -oqdsss_objs\D rpg.d -ofrpg Command C:\utils\dmd\dsss\bin\rebuild.exe returned with code 1, aborting. Error: Command failed, aborting.Which I have absolutely no idea what means, nor how to go about fixing it.
Oct 15 2008
"Bill Baxter" <wbaxter gmail.com> On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 6:13 AM, Sergey Gromov <snake.scaly gmail.com> wrote:Wed, 15 Oct 2008 16:24:42 -0400, Robert Kosek wrote:The most recent release of DSSS/rebuild takes a long long time to build programs. There's definitely something not quite right about it. I've gone back to the previous version of DSSS (0.76pre is what I have actually). --bbJarrett Billingsley wrote:May I recommend you to try 'bud' ? http://dsource.org/projects/build It's a single executable, pretty similar to 'rebuild' and can be used like this: bud rpg.d I've had weird problems with rebuild recently.Oh, I just realized what it is, I think. Don't build dice.d, dsss will build it for you automatically. Just do "dsss build rpg.d" and it'll automatically compile and link rpg as well as any dependent modules. I think it's trying to compile dice.d as a program, which of course won't work.Hmm, that's an interesting idea. However, if I do that I get the following error:dsss build rpg.d rpg.d => rpg + C:\utils\dmd\dsss\bin\rebuild.exe -Idsss_imports\ -I. -S.\ -IC:\utils\dmd\dsss \include\d -SC:\utils\dmd\dsss\lib\ -IC:\utils\dmd\dsss\include\d -SC:\utils\dm d\dsss\lib -oqdsss_objs\D rpg.d -ofrpg Command C:\utils\dmd\dsss\bin\rebuild.exe returned with code 1, aborting. Error: Command failed, aborting.Which I have absolutely no idea what means, nor how to go about fixing it.
Oct 15 2008
Sergey Gromov wrote:May I recommend you to try 'bud' ? http://dsource.org/projects/build It's a single executable, pretty similar to 'rebuild' and can be used like this: bud rpg.d I've had weird problems with rebuild recently.Thanks for the recommendation. That, plus one other thing, fixed my whole problem. Thanks a bunch! I'll definitely be using Bud from now on. ;-) Thanks, Robert
Oct 15 2008
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 5:54 PM, Robert Kosek <robert.kosek thewickedflea.com> wrote:Sergey Gromov wrote:Keep in mind, though, that Bud is ancient and the author has, I believe, stated that he is no longer interested in maintaining it. There are undoubtedly times when it will break.May I recommend you to try 'bud' ? http://dsource.org/projects/build It's a single executable, pretty similar to 'rebuild' and can be used like this: bud rpg.d I've had weird problems with rebuild recently.Thanks for the recommendation. That, plus one other thing, fixed my whole problem. Thanks a bunch! I'll definitely be using Bud from now on. ;-)
Oct 15 2008
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 7:30 AM, Jarrett Billingsley <jarrett.billingsley gmail.com> wrote:On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 5:54 PM, Robert Kosek <robert.kosek thewickedflea.com> wrote:Well, part right. It is ancient, but the author has stated on a number of occasions in the not too distant past that a new version would be released "next week". But the author has also said most recently that he has no interest D1 any more and D2 changes too fast. So I'm not sure where that leaves Bud. On the other hand the author of DSSS has said he won't have much time for it either, now that he's in grad school. And he hasn't responded to questions about the speed issues with the most recent DSSS release. So... I think maybe it's a difficult choice between the two build tools right now. May be a good time to give SCONS a look. :-) --bbSergey Gromov wrote:Keep in mind, though, that Bud is ancient and the author has, I believe, stated that he is no longer interested in maintaining it. There are undoubtedly times when it will break.May I recommend you to try 'bud' ? http://dsource.org/projects/build It's a single executable, pretty similar to 'rebuild' and can be used like this: bud rpg.d I've had weird problems with rebuild recently.Thanks for the recommendation. That, plus one other thing, fixed my whole problem. Thanks a bunch! I'll definitely be using Bud from now on. ;-)
Oct 15 2008
Bill Baxter wrote:On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 7:30 AM, Jarrett Billingsley <jarrett.billingsley gmail.com> wrote:Or learn how to write makefiles... yuk!On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 5:54 PM, Robert Kosek <robert.kosek thewickedflea.com> wrote:Well, part right. It is ancient, but the author has stated on a number of occasions in the not too distant past that a new version would be released "next week". But the author has also said most recently that he has no interest D1 any more and D2 changes too fast. So I'm not sure where that leaves Bud. On the other hand the author of DSSS has said he won't have much time for it either, now that he's in grad school. And he hasn't responded to questions about the speed issues with the most recent DSSS release. So... I think maybe it's a difficult choice between the two build tools right now. May be a good time to give SCONS a look. :-)Sergey Gromov wrote:Keep in mind, though, that Bud is ancient and the author has, I believe, stated that he is no longer interested in maintaining it. There are undoubtedly times when it will break.May I recommend you to try 'bud' ? http://dsource.org/projects/build It's a single executable, pretty similar to 'rebuild' and can be used like this: bud rpg.d I've had weird problems with rebuild recently.Thanks for the recommendation. That, plus one other thing, fixed my whole problem. Thanks a bunch! I'll definitely be using Bud from now on. ;-)
Oct 15 2008
Chris R. Miller wrote:Bill Baxter wrote:Or maybe some enterprising soul could modify PreMake[1] to generate Makefiles compatible with Digital Mars make (which would be useful for any C/C++/D app using DM* compilers). [1] http://premake.sourceforge.net/On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 7:30 AM, Jarrett Billingsley <jarrett.billingsley gmail.com> wrote:Or learn how to write makefiles... yuk!On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 5:54 PM, Robert Kosek <robert.kosek thewickedflea.com> wrote:Well, part right. It is ancient, but the author has stated on a number of occasions in the not too distant past that a new version would be released "next week". But the author has also said most recently that he has no interest D1 any more and D2 changes too fast. So I'm not sure where that leaves Bud. On the other hand the author of DSSS has said he won't have much time for it either, now that he's in grad school. And he hasn't responded to questions about the speed issues with the most recent DSSS release. So... I think maybe it's a difficult choice between the two build tools right now. May be a good time to give SCONS a look. :-)Sergey Gromov wrote:Keep in mind, though, that Bud is ancient and the author has, I believe, stated that he is no longer interested in maintaining it. There are undoubtedly times when it will break.May I recommend you to try 'bud' ? http://dsource.org/projects/build It's a single executable, pretty similar to 'rebuild' and can be used like this: bud rpg.d I've had weird problems with rebuild recently.Thanks for the recommendation. That, plus one other thing, fixed my whole problem. Thanks a bunch! I'll definitely be using Bud from now on. ;-)
Oct 15 2008
Mike Parker wrote:Chris R. Miller wrote:Hmm, in the mean time, I did run across an interesting (and delightfully terse) make tutorial a while back: http://mrbook.org/tutorials/make/ The final example file at the end is most useful.Bill Baxter wrote:Or maybe some enterprising soul could modify PreMake[1] to generate Makefiles compatible with Digital Mars make (which would be useful for any C/C++/D app using DM* compilers). [1] http://premake.sourceforge.net/On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 7:30 AM, Jarrett Billingsley <jarrett.billingsley gmail.com> wrote:Or learn how to write makefiles... yuk!On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 5:54 PM, Robert Kosek <robert.kosek thewickedflea.com> wrote:Well, part right. It is ancient, but the author has stated on a number of occasions in the not too distant past that a new version would be released "next week". But the author has also said most recently that he has no interest D1 any more and D2 changes too fast. So I'm not sure where that leaves Bud. On the other hand the author of DSSS has said he won't have much time for it either, now that he's in grad school. And he hasn't responded to questions about the speed issues with the most recent DSSS release. So... I think maybe it's a difficult choice between the two build tools right now. May be a good time to give SCONS a look. :-)Sergey Gromov wrote:Keep in mind, though, that Bud is ancient and the author has, I believe, stated that he is no longer interested in maintaining it. There are undoubtedly times when it will break.May I recommend you to try 'bud' ? http://dsource.org/projects/build It's a single executable, pretty similar to 'rebuild' and can be used like this: bud rpg.d I've had weird problems with rebuild recently.Thanks for the recommendation. That, plus one other thing, fixed my whole problem. Thanks a bunch! I'll definitely be using Bud from now on. ;-)
Oct 15 2008
Bill Baxter wrote:On the other hand the author of DSSS has said he won't have much time for it either, now that he's in grad school. And he hasn't responded to questions about the speed issues with the most recent DSSS release.I try to help out Gregor the best I can, though I can not promise to solve all problems, known or unknown, of both, Rebuild and DSSS. But, I can look into it and make Gregor solve it, *somehow*. Maybe when we bribe him with enough Moxie.
Oct 15 2008