• =?UTF-8?B?Tm9yZGzDtnc=?= (7/7) Jan 06 2017 Why isn't there an overload for `std.algorithm.sorting.sort` that
• =?UTF-8?B?Tm9yZGzDtnc=?= (3/5) Jan 06 2017 Perhaps under a different name `sortBy`
• =?UTF-8?B?Tm9yZGzDtnc=?= (5/8) Jan 06 2017 Oops,

=?UTF-8?B?Tm9yZGzDtnc=?= <per.nordlow gmail.com> writes:

Why isn't there an overload for `std.algorithm.sorting.sort` that 
takes a `unaryFun` lambda?

Something like

     x[].sort!"a.m";

sorting elements in `x` according to the value of element member 
`m` compared to the longer

     x[].sort!"a.m < b.m";

=?UTF-8?B?Tm9yZGzDtnc=?= <per.nordlow gmail.com> writes:

On Friday, 6 January 2017 at 15:36:42 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
 Something like

     x[].sort!"a.m";

Perhaps under a different name `sortBy`

    x[].sortBy!"a.m";

=?UTF-8?B?Tm9yZGzDtnc=?= <per.nordlow gmail.com> writes:

On Friday, 6 January 2017 at 15:36:42 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
 Why isn't there an overload for `std.algorithm.sorting.sort` 
 that takes a `unaryFun` lambda?

     x[].sort!"a.m < b.m";

Oops,

http://forum.dlang.org/post/nxdsmdimnfssqmeybuxp forum.dlang.org
https://github.com/nordlow/phobos-next/blob/master/src/sort_ex.d

Deja vu