• drug (2/2) Mar 02 2015 I guess the reason why std.conv.emplace is not @nogc-ed is that nobody
• Tobias Pankrath (2/5) Mar 02 2015 It's a template and an instance will be @nogc, if possible.
• Adam D. Ruppe (3/3) Mar 02 2015 It should be automatically inferred. emplace might be used to
• Kapps (3/6) Mar 02 2015 Soon:

drug <drug2004 bk.ru> writes:

I guess the reason why std.conv.emplace is not  nogc-ed is that nobody 
added it yet? I didn't see using of gc in the emplace sources.

"Tobias Pankrath" <tobias pankrath.net> writes:

On Monday, 2 March 2015 at 12:37:33 UTC, drug wrote:
 I guess the reason why std.conv.emplace is not  nogc-ed is that 
 nobody added it yet? I didn't see using of gc in the emplace 
 sources.

It's a template and an instance will be  nogc, if possible.

"Adam D. Ruppe" <destructionator gmail.com> writes:

It should be automatically inferred. emplace might be used to 
call constructors that use the GC and putting an explicit  nogc 
on it forbids that, so it would limit the flexibility.

"Kapps" <opantm2+spam gmail.com> writes:

On Monday, 2 March 2015 at 12:37:33 UTC, drug wrote:
 I guess the reason why std.conv.emplace is not  nogc-ed is that 
 nobody added it yet? I didn't see using of gc in the emplace 
 sources.

Soon:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/2999